In the 2002 ANPRM, the Treasury Department and the IRS solicited comments relating to the name of the office and appointment of the Director. In January of 2003, the Office of Professional Responsibility was established and replaced the office of the Director of Practice. This change, which was supported by many commentators, reflects the office’s commitment to ensuring the integrity of the tax system and recognition of tax professionals as an integral part of effective tax administration. The proposed regulations change references to the Office of the Director of Practice to the Office of Professional Responsibility. The Director of the Office of Professional Responsibility is appointed by the Secretary, or his or her delegate. The text of the regulations also will be changed to eliminate references to the Office of the Secretary to reflect the prior transfer of the Office of Professional Responsibility to the IRS. See 47 FR 29918 (July 9, 1982).

On October 22, 2004, the President signed the Jobs Act. Section 822(b) of the Act amends section 330 of title 31 of the United States Code by adding a provision that recognizes the Secretary’s authority to impose standards for written advice rendered with respect to any entity, transaction plan or arrangement, or other plan or arrangement having a potential for tax avoidance or evasion. Accordingly, §10.2(d) of the proposed regulations is modified to clarify that the rendering of this written advice is practice before the IRS subject to Circular 230 when it is provided by a practitioner.

The Advisory Committee for Tax Exempt/Governmental Entities recently suggested that individuals who provide technical services to plan sponsors to maintain the tax qualified status of their retirement plans (retirement plan administrators) should be authorized to practice provided they demonstrate the competency to do so. The Treasury Department and the IRS are considering this proposal and invite public comments even though text is not proposed in this notice of proposed rulemaking. The Advisory Committee’s proposal suggests limiting the practice by this group of individuals to representation relating to filing applications for determination letters, Forms 5500, employee plan audits, and negotiating with the IRS with respect to voluntary compliance matters.

In addition, the Advisory Committee proposes procedures for enrollment similar to the current Enrolled Agent program (see §§10.4-10.6), including an examination to determine competency, a renewal process and continuing professional education requirements. For more information relating to practice by retirement plan administrators, see Establishing the Enrolled Retirement Plan Agent Under Circular 230, Advisory Committee for Tax Exempt/Governmental Entities (June 2005). The Treasury Department and the IRS also invite comments on proposals relating to limited practice by other individuals that the public believes competent to represent taxpayers before the IRS, and whether the Director of the Office of Professional Responsibility should have the authority to regulate these individuals through IRS notice procedures.

Section 10.5 of the regulations sets forth the applicable procedures relating to the enrollment of an enrolled agent. The proposed regulations provide that applicants for enrollment must utilize forms and comply with procedures established and published by the Office of Professional Responsibility. The proposed regulations permit the Office of Professional Responsibility to change the “Application for Enrollment to Practice Before the IRS” and other requirements pertaining to the procedures to apply for enrollment.

Section 10.6 of the regulations sets forth the procedures for renewal of enrollment to practice before the IRS. Under the current regulations, the Director of the Office of Professional Responsibility must maintain a list of enrolled agents, including those who are active, inactive and sanctioned. This requirement is combined with the roster requirements of §10.90 in the proposed regulations to clarify that all rosters, including those related to enrolled agents, will be maintained and made available for public inspection in the time and manner prescribed by the Secretary.

The proposed regulations clarify the requirements to maintain active enrollment to practice before the IRS. An enrolled agent must apply for renewal of enrollment between November 1 and January 31 of the relevant period described in §10.6(d). The effective date of renewal is the first day of the third month following the close of the period for renewal, i.e., April 1. An enrolled agent must complete 72 hours of continuing professional education during each enrollment cycle, with a minimum of 16 hours (including two hours of ethics) during each enrollment year. The enrollment year is each calendar year, i.e., January 1 to December 31, in the enrollment cycle. The enrollment cycle is the three successive enrollment years preceding the April 1 effective date of renewal. Thus, an enrolled agent whose social security number ends with 0 must renew enrollment between November 1, 2006, and January 31, 2007. The enrolled agent must have completed 72 hours of continuing professional education between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2006, with at least 16 hours (including two hours of ethics) during each calendar year. Similarly, the proposed regulations require sponsors of continuing education courses to renew their status as qualified sponsors every three years.

The proposed regulations require that a qualifying course enhance professional knowledge in Federal taxation or Federal tax related matters and be consistent with the Internal Revenue Code and effective tax administration.

In the 2002 ANPRM, the Treasury Department and IRS solicited comments relating to limited practice by unenrolled return preparers. Most commentators opposed expanding the authority of the Director of the Office of Professional Responsibility to include the authority to modify the scope of limited practice by unenrolled preparers without further amendment to Circular 230. Most commentators agreed that the Director of the Office of Professional Responsibility should not be given the authority to determine the eligibility for limited practice by unenrolled preparers.

Section 10.7(c)(1)(viii) currently authorizes an individual, who is not otherwise a practitioner, to represent a taxpayer during an examination if that individual prepared the return for the taxable period under examination. The proposed regulations revoke this authorization because it is inconsistent with the requirement that all individuals permitted to practice before the IRS demonstrate their qualifications to advise and assist persons in presenting their cases to the IRS.

Under the proposed regulations, an unenrolled return preparer may not represent a taxpayer unless otherwise authorized by §10.7(c)(1)(i) - (vii). These individuals no longer may negotiate with the IRS on behalf of a taxpayer during an examination and no longer may bind a taxpayer to a position during an examination. For example, an unenrolled return preparer may not sign a Form 872, “Consent to Extend the Time to Assess Tax,” with regard to the tax return prepared for that individual. In addition, an unenrolled return preparer may not agree to any adjustment to the taxpayer’s reported tax liability.

Individuals who are not eligible to practice and who prepare an original return may assist in the exchange of information with the IRS regarding a taxpayer’s return if the taxpayer has specifically authorized the preparer to receive confidential tax information from the IRS. Revocation of the authority for limited practice will not preclude a return preparer from assisting a taxpayer in responding to questions regarding the taxpayer’s return. The proposed regulations do not preclude an unenrolled return preparer from accompanying a taxpayer to an examination, provided the taxpayer authorizes the IRS to disclose confidential tax information to the unenrolled return preparer.

Section 10.25 sets forth rules governing practice by former government employees, their business partners and their associates. These rules were first promulgated in 1976 to address discrepancies between the Government-wide post-employment statute, 18 U.S.C. 207, its implementing regulations and the codes of professional responsibility (e.g., ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, AICPA Code of Professional Conduct and individual state rules of professional conduct) applicable to practitioners who appear before the IRS.

Section 10.25 of the proposed regulations has been conformed with the terminology used in 18 U.S.C. 207, and 5 C.F.R. parts 2637 and 2641 (or superseding regulations), by eliminating the definitions of official responsibility in §10.25(a)(5), participate or participation in §10.25(a)(6), and transaction in §10.25(a)(8) and substituting the term particular matter involving specific parties in §10.25(a)(4) (formerly §10.25(a)(8)).

The proposed regulations also eliminate the prohibition in §10.25(b)(3) against assisting in the representation in matters in which the former employee had official responsibility during the former employee’s last year of service. Existing statutes, regulations and codes of professional responsibility are adequate to protect against conflicts of interest and protect the integrity of the tax system, including the prohibition on representation in 18 U.S.C. 207.

Section 10.25(b)(2) of the proposed regulations continues to prohibit former employees who personally and substantially participated in a matter while in Government service from representing or assisting in the representation in the same matter while in private practice. In these matters, the former employee’s firm may represent the taxpayer in the matter if the former employee is isolated from the matter and isolation statements are filed with the Office of Professional Responsibility in accordance with §10.25(c).

In the 2002 ANPRM, the Treasury Department and the IRS solicited comments relating to contingent fees. Most commentators opposed further limitations on contingent fees under §10.27. The Treasury Department and the IRS continue to believe that a rule restricting contingent fees for preparing tax returns supports voluntary compliance with the Federal tax laws by discouraging return positions that exploit the audit selection process. Additionally, a broader prohibition against contingent fee arrangements is appropriate in light of concerns regarding attorney and auditor independence. The recent shift toward even greater independence, including rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, also support expanding the prohibition on contingent fees with respect to Federal tax matters.

Under section 10.27 of the proposed regulations, a practitioner generally is precluded from charging a contingent fee for services rendered in connection with any matter before the Service, including the preparation or filing of a tax return, amended tax return or claim for refund or credit. A practitioner may, however, charge a contingent fee for services rendered in connection with the IRS’s examination of, or challenge to, an original tax return. Practitioners also may charge a contingent fee for services rendered in connection with the IRS’s examination of, or challenge to, an amended return or claim for refund or credit filed prior to the taxpayer receiving notice of the examination of, or challenge to the original tax return. A written notice of examination would include the written notice furnished to taxpayers subject to the Coordinated Industry Case procedures requesting a statement showing additional tax due (or an adequate disclosure with respect to an item or position) to avoid the imposition of certain accuracy-related penalties if no other written notice of examination is received. Contingent fees also may be charged for services rendered in connection with a judicial proceeding arising under the Federal tax laws.

Section 10.29 of the regulations prohibits a practitioner from representing conflicting interests before the IRS, except with the express consent of all directly interested parties after full disclosure. Section 10.29 is generally consistent with Rule 1.7 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct (Model Rules), which was amended just prior to the July 26, 2002 amendment to the regulations.

Section 10.29 of the proposed regulations clarifies that a practitioner is required to obtain consents in writing from each affected client in order to represent the conflicting interests. The written consent may vary in form. The practitioner may prepare a letter to the client outlining the conflict, as well as the possible implications of the conflict, and submit the letter to the client for the client to countersign. Unlike the Model Rules, which permit affected clients to provide informed consent orally if the consent is contemporaneously documented by the practitioner in writing, an oral consent followed by a confirmation letter authored by the practitioner will not satisfy §10.29 unless the confirmation letter is countersigned by the client.

Section 10.34 sets forth standards applicable to advice with respect to tax return positions and applicable to preparing or signing returns. Section 10.34 of the proposed regulations sets forth standards applicable to practitioners who advise clients with respect to documents, affidavits and other papers submitted to the IRS. The proposed regulations also provide separate standards for papers that take a position with respect to Federal tax matters and standards for advising a client to file papers involving procedural or factual matters.

Under the proposed regulations, a practitioner may not advise a client to take a position on a submission to the IRS unless the position is not frivolous. A practitioner also may not advise a client to submit a document to the IRS that is meant primarily for delay; is frivolous or groundless; or contains or omits information in a manner that demonstrates an intentional disregard of a rule or regulation. With regard to factual matters, a practitioner may rely upon information furnished by the taxpayer with respect to tax returns and documents, affidavits and other papers, unless the information appears to be incorrect, inconsistent with an important fact or another factual assumption, or incomplete. These standards would supplement the existing requirement in §10.22 that practitioners exercise due diligence in preparing, or assisting in the preparation of, tax returns and other documents relating to IRS matters.

In accordance with section 822(a) of the Jobs Act, proposed §10.50 authorizes the Secretary to impose a monetary penalty against a practitioner if the practitioner is shown to be incompetent or disreputable, fails to comply with any regulation in part 10, or with intent to defraud, willfully and knowingly misleads or threatens a client or prospective client.

Under the proposed regulations, the monetary penalty may be imposed in addition to, or in lieu of, any other sanction. If a practitioner acts on behalf of the practitioner’s employer, firm or other entity and the employer, firm or other entity knew or should have known of the practitioner’s conduct, the Secretary may impose a monetary penalty on the employer, firm or other entity. The Treasury Department and the IRS will issue procedures relating to the imposition of the monetary penalty through separate published guidance.

The proposed regulations also contain conforming amendments to other provisions relating to sanctions.

In the 2002 ANPRM, the Treasury Department and the IRS solicited comments relating to whether the definition of disreputable conduct should include the willful failure of a preparer who is a practitioner to sign a return. Many commentators supported expanding the definition of disreputable conduct to specifically include the willful failure of a practitioner who is a tax return preparer to sign a return.

Section 10.51 of the regulations defines disreputable conduct for which a practitioner may be sanctioned. Section 10.51 of the proposed regulations modifies the definition of disreputable conduct to include willful failure to sign a tax return prepared by the practitioner. The definition of disreputable conduct also includes the disclosure or use of returns or return information by practitioners in a manner not authorized by the Code, a court of competent jurisdiction, or an administrative law judge in a proceeding instituted under section 10.60.

Section 10.65 provides that the Director of the Office of Professional Responsibility may file supplemental charges against a practitioner or appraiser. Section 10.65 of the proposed regulations provides that the Director may file supplemental charges against a practitioner by amending the complaint to reflect the additional charges if the practitioner is given notice and an opportunity to prepare a defense to the supplemental charges.

In the 2002 ANPRM, the Treasury Department and the IRS solicited comments relating to expanding discovery and providing greater procedural protections in disciplinary proceedings. Most commentators supported expanding the use of discovery in disciplinary proceedings. Most commentators also supported providing further procedural protections such as a guarantee of the right to cross-examine witnesses.

These proposed regulations redesignate the provisions relating to hearings, evidence and depositions and discovery. Proposed §10.71 addresses discovery, proposed §10.72 addresses hearings and proposed §10.73 addresses evidence.

Section 10.68 of the regulations sets forth procedures for filing a motion or request with the Administrative Law Judge presiding over a disciplinary proceeding. The regulations provide that a party is not presumed to oppose a motion for decision by default for failure to file a timely answer or for failure to prosecute. The proposed regulations amend §10.68 to expressly allow a party to file a motion for summary adjudication if there is no genuine issue as to any material fact.

Section 10.71 of the proposed regulations clarifies the discovery methods available to the parties in preparation for a disciplinary hearing. The Administrative Law Judge may authorize discovery if the party seeking discovery establishes that it is necessary and relevant. Discovery methods include depositions upon oral examination and requests for admission. The Administrative Law Judge should weigh factors such as the ultimate relevancy and anticipated costs to determine the least burdensome method in ordering discovery.

Discovery is not permitted if the information is privileged or the information relates to mental impressions, conclusions or legal theories of any attorney, party, or other representative of a party prepared in anticipation of a proceeding.

To address practitioners’ due process rights without creating a formal court proceeding, the proposed regulations require the Director of the Office of Professional Responsibility to turn over the documentation used in support of a complaint filed with the Administrative Law Judge. Under §10.63(d) of the proposed regulations, this information must be served on the practitioner or appraiser, or the representative, within 10 days of serving the complaint. This requirement, however, is only an initial disclosure of the evidence of record at the time of the complaint. Supplemental evidence developed during preparation for the hearing is not prohibited from being introduced.

Under §10.62(c) of the proposed regulations, the Director of the Office of Professional Responsibility must notify the practitioner or appraiser of the time for answering the complaint, which cannot be less than 30 days. When determining the time for answering the complaint, the Director will take into account the amount of the evidence in support of the complaint and the complexity of the charges to allow the practitioner or appraiser time to prepare an adequate answer in defense to the complaint.

Section 10.72 of the regulations sets forth the procedures for an administrative hearing pursuant to Circular 230. The Administrative Law Judge should conduct the hearing within 180 days of the time for filing of the answer, absent circumstances requiring that, in the interest of justice, the hearing be held at a later date. The proposed regulations amend §10.72 to allow each party to a disciplinary proceeding, as may be required for a full and true disclosure of the facts, to question, in the presence of the Administrative Law Judge, a person whose statement is offered by the opposing party. The proposed regulations incorporate the requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 556(d)). The proposed regulations do not prohibit a party from presenting evidence contained in a deposition if all parties to the proceeding were given an opportunity for full examination and cross-examination of the witness under §10.71. The proposed regulations generally require pre-hearing memoranda. The Administrative Law Judge may determine that pre-hearing memoranda are not necessary or, by order, require other information with respect to the disciplinary proceeding.

Currently, disciplinary proceedings brought pursuant to Circular 230 are closed to the public unless the Administrative Law Judge grants a practitioner’s request that the proceedings be public. The proposed regulations amend §10.72(d) to provide that all hearings, reports, evidence and decisions in a disciplinary proceeding be available for public inspection. The proposed regulations mandate procedures to protect the identities of any third party taxpayers contained in returns and return information obtained pursuant to section 6103(l)(4) for use in an action or proceeding under subpart D. The procedures to protect the identities of third party taxpayers also must be observed with respect to discovery matters.

The Administrative Law Judge must issue a protective order in the event that redactions of taxpayer identifiers render documents unintelligible or may still permit indirect identification of the taxpayer. The Administrative Law Judge may, for good cause, order proceedings closed to the public or may order nondisclosure of materials associated with the proceeding, such as in the case in which disclosure is prohibited by 18 U.S.C. 1905 or section 6103. The Administrative Law Judge also may order limited access to materials which are confidential or sensitive in some other way.

The proposed regulations provide that, at the conclusion of a proceeding, the Secretary, or his or her delegate, shall ensure that all returns and return information, including the names, addresses or other identifying details of third party taxpayers, are redacted and replaced with the code assigned to the corresponding taxpayer in all documents prior to such documents being made available for further public inspection.

Section 10.76 of the regulations sets forth the requirements for the decision of the Administrative Law Judge. The proposed regulations amend §10.76 to provide that the Administrative Law Judge should render a decision within 180 days after the conclusion of the hearing. If a party files a motion for summary adjudication, the Administrative Law Judge should rule on the motion within 60 days after a written response to the motion for summary adjudication or, if no written response is filed, 90 days after the motion for summary adjudication is filed.

The proposed regulations provide that the decision of the Administrative Law Judge will become the final decision of the agency 45 days after the date the decision is served on the parties. The Secretary may, however, either in response to a petition for review filed by a party or on the Secretary’s own initiative, intervene and order review of the Administrative Law Judge’s decision before the decision becomes final. The petition for review must be filed within 30 days of the date the decision is served on the parties.

If the Secretary grants a petition or otherwise orders review, the Secretary must notify the parties within 45 days from the date the Administrative Law Judge’s decision is served on the parties. The notice must state that (1) the decision is under review, (2) no final agency decision has been made, (3) any action of the Administrative Law Judge is inoperative, and (4) a final decision of the agency made by the Secretary is required before judicial review can be obtained. The Secretary will not review an interlocutory order or ruling, e.g., a discovery request ruling, of the Administrative Law Judge prior to the rendering of a decision by the Administrative Law Judge that would dispose of the proceeding.

Section 10.82 of the regulations authorizes the Director of the Office of Professional Responsibility to suspend immediately a practitioner who has engaged in certain conduct. The proposed regulations extend the expedited process to practitioners who are in egregious noncompliance with their tax obligations or have been adjudicated as having advanced arguments, relating to the practitioner’s own tax obligations or the obligations of the client, primarily for delay.

The Treasury Department and the IRS are aware of a number of practitioners who are not in compliance with their own Federal tax obligations, but continue to represent taxpayers, and of situations in which practitioners advance frivolous or obstructionist positions relating to their own tax obligations and the obligations of their clients. Under the proposed regulations, a practitioner who is not compliant with the practitioner’s own Federal tax obligations may be subject to expedited disciplinary proceedings. In addition, a practitioner who has been found by a court of competent jurisdiction to have advanced frivolous arguments or advanced arguments primarily for delay, either relating to a taxpayer’s tax liability or relating to the practitioner’s own tax liability, will be subject to an expedited disciplinary proceeding.

(a) Establishment of office. The Office of Professional Responsibility is established in the Internal Revenue Service. The Director of the Office of Professional Responsibility is appointed by the Secretary of the Treasury, or his or her delegate.

(b) Duties. The Director of the Office of Professional Responsibility acts on applications for enrollment to practice before the Internal Revenue Service; makes inquiries with respect to matters under his or her jurisdiction; institutes and provides for the conduct of disciplinary proceedings relating to practitioners (and employers, firms or other entities, if applicable) and appraisers; and performs other duties as are necessary or appropriate to carry out his or her functions under this part or as are otherwise prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury, or his or her delegate.

(c) Acting Director of the Office of Professional Responsibility. The Secretary of the Treasury, or his or her delegate, will designate an officer or employee of the Treasury Department to act as Director of the Office of Professional Responsibility in the absence of the Director or a vacancy in that office.

(d) Effective date. This section is applicable on the date that final regulations are published in the Federal Register.

Par. 4. Section 10.2 is amended to read as follows:

(a) As used in this part, except where the text provides otherwise—

(1) Attorney means any person who is a member in good standing of the bar of the highest court of any State, territory, or possession of the United States, including a Commonwealth, or the District of Columbia.

(2) Certified public accountant means any person who is duly qualified to practice as a certified public accountant in any State, territory, or possession of the United States, including a Commonwealth, or the District of Columbia.

(3) Commissioner refers to the Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

(4) Practice before the Internal Revenue Service comprehends all matters connected with a presentation to the Internal Revenue Service or any of its officers or employees relating to a taxpayer’s rights, privileges, or liabilities under laws or regulations administered by the Internal Revenue Service. Such presentations include, but are not limited to, preparing and filing documents, corresponding and communicating with the Internal Revenue Service, rendering written advice with respect to any entity, transaction plan or arrangement, or other plan or arrangement having a potential for tax avoidance or evasion, and representing a client at conferences, hearings and meetings.

(5) Practitioner means any individual described in paragraphs (a), (b), (c), or (d) of §10.3.

(6) A tax return includes an amended tax return and a claim for refund.

(7) Service means the Internal Revenue Service.

(b) Effective date. This section is applicable on the date that final regulations are published in the Federal Register.

Par. 5. Section 10.5 is amended by revising paragraphs (a) and (b) and adding paragraph (f) to read as follows:

(a) Form; address. An applicant for enrollment must apply as required by forms or procedures established and published by the Office of Professional Responsibility, including proper execution of required forms under oath or affirmation. The address on the application will be the address under which a successful applicant is enrolled and is the address to which all correspondence concerning enrollment will be sent.

(b) Fee. The applicant must pay the fee established and published by the Office of Professional Responsibility. This fee will be reflected on applicable forms and will be retained regardless of whether the applicant is granted enrollment.

* * * * *

(f) Effective date. This section is applicable to enrollment applications received on or after the date that final regulations are published in the Federal Register.

Par. 6. Section 10.6 is amended by:

1. Removing paragraph (a).

2. Redesignating paragraph (c) as paragraph (a).

3. Adding a new paragraph (c).

4. Revising paragraphs (d) introductory text, (d)(5), (d)(6), (d)(7), (e), (f)(1), (f)(2)(iv)(A), (g)(5), (k)(7) and (l).

5. Adding a new paragraph (p).

The revisions and additions read as follows:

* * * * *

(c) Change of address. An enrolled agent must send notification of any change of address to the address specified by the Director of the Office of Professional Responsibility. This notification must include the enrolled agent’s name, prior address, new address, social security number or tax identification number and the date.

(d) Renewal of enrollment. To maintain active enrollment to practice before the Internal Revenue Service, each individual is required to have his or her enrollment renewed. Failure to receive notification from the Director of the Office of Professional Responsibility of the renewal requirement will not be justification for the individual’s failure to satisfy this requirement.

* * * * *

(5) The Director of the Office of Professional Responsibility will notify the individual of his or her renewal of enrollment and will issue the individual a card evidencing enrollment.

(6) A reasonable nonrefundable fee may be charged for each application for renewal of enrollment filed with the Director of the Office of Professional Responsibility.

(7) Forms required for renewal may be obtained by sending a written request to the Director of the Office of Professional Responsibility, Internal Revenue Service, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20224 or from such other source as the Director of the Office of Professional Responsibility will publish in the Internal Revenue Bulletin (see 26 CFR §601.601(d)(2)) and on the Internal Revenue Service webpage (www.irs.gov).

(e) Condition for renewal: continuing professional education. In order to qualify for renewal of enrollment, an individual enrolled to practice before the Internal Revenue Service must certify, on the application for renewal form prescribed by the Director of the Office of Professional Responsibility, that he or she has satisfied the following continuing professional education requirements.

(1) Definitions. For purposes of this section—

(i) Enrollment year means January 1 to December 31 of each year of an enrollment cycle.

(ii) Enrollment cycle means the three successive enrollment years preceding the effective date of renewal.

(iii) The effective date of renewal is the first day of the third month following the close of the period for renewal described in paragraph (d) of this section.

(2) For renewed enrollment effective after December 31, 2006—(i) Requirements for enrollment cycle. A minimum of 72 hours of continuing education credit must be completed during each enrollment cycle.

(ii) Requirements for enrollment year. A minimum of 16 hours of continuing education credit, including 2 hours of ethics or professional conduct, must be completed during each enrollment year of an enrollment cycle.

(iii) Enrollment during enrollment cycle—(A) In general. Subject to paragraph (2)(iii)(B) of this section, an individual who receives initial enrollment during an enrollment cycle must complete 2 hours of qualifying continuing education credit for each month enrolled during the enrollment cycle. Enrollment for any part of a month is considered enrollment for the entire month.

(B) Ethics. An individual who receives initial enrollment during an enrollment cycle must complete 2 hours of ethics or professional conduct for each enrollment year during the enrollment cycle. Enrollment for any part of an enrollment year is considered enrollment for the entire year.

(f) Qualifying continuing education—(1) General. To qualify for continuing education credit, a course of learning must—

(i) Be a qualifying program designed to enhance professional knowledge in Federal taxation or Federal tax related matters, i.e., programs comprised of current subject matter in Federal taxation or Federal tax related matters, including accounting, tax preparation software and taxation or ethics;

(ii) Be a qualifying program consistent with the Internal Revenue Code and effective tax administration; and

(iii) Be sponsored by a qualifying sponsor.

(2) * * *

(iv) Credit for published articles, books, etc. (A) Continuing education credit will be awarded for publications on Federal taxation or Federal tax related matters, including accounting, tax preparation software, and taxation or ethics, provided the content of such publications is current and designed for the enhancement of the professional knowledge of an individual enrolled to practice before the Internal Revenue Service. The publication must be consistent with the Internal Revenue Code and effective tax administration.

* * * * *

(g) * * *

(5) Sponsor renewal—(i) In general. A sponsor maintains its status as a qualified sponsor during the sponsor enrollment cycle.

(ii) Renewal period. Each sponsor must file an application to renew its status as a qualified sponsor between May 1 and July 31, 2008. Thereafter, applications for renewal will be required between May 1 and July 31 of every subsequent third year.

(iii) Effective date of renewal. The effective date of renewal is the first day of the third month following the close of the renewal period.

(iv) Sponsor enrollment cycle. The sponsor enrollment cycle is the three successive calendar years preceding the effective date of renewal.

* * * * *

(k) * * *

(7) Inactive enrollment status is not available to an individual who is the subject of a disciplinary matter in the Office of Professional Responsibility.

(l) Inactive retirement status. An individual who no longer practices before the Internal Revenue Service may request being placed in an inactive retirement status at any time and such individual will be placed in an inactive retirement status. The individual will be ineligible to practice before the Internal Revenue Service. Such individual must file a timely application for renewal of enrollment at each applicable renewal or enrollment period as provided in this section. An individual who is placed in an inactive retirement status may be reinstated to an active enrollment status by filing an application for renewal of enrollment and providing evidence of the completion of the required continuing professional education hours for the enrollment cycle. Inactive retirement status is not available to an individual who is the subject of a disciplinary matter in the Office of Professional Responsibility.

* * * * *

(p) Effective date. This section is applicable to enrollment effective on or after the date that final regulations are published in the Federal Register.

Par. 7. Section 10.7 is amended by:

1. Removing paragraph (c)(1)(viii).

2. Revising paragraph (c)(2)(ii).

3. And adding paragraph (g).

The revisions and additions read as follows:

* * * * *

(c) * * *

(2) * * *

(ii) The Director, after notice and opportunity for a conference, may deny eligibility to engage in limited practice before the Internal Revenue Service under paragraph (c)(1) of this section to any individual who has engaged in conduct that would justify a sanction under §10.50.

* * * * *

(g) Effective date. This section is applicable on the date that final regulations are published in the Federal Register.

Par. 8. Section 10.22 is amended by revising paragraph (b) and adding paragraph (c) to read as follows:

* * * * *

(b) Reliance on others. Except as provided in §§10.34 and 10.35, a practitioner will be presumed to have exercised due diligence for purposes of this section if the practitioner relies on the work product of another person and the practitioner used reasonable care in engaging, supervising, training, and evaluating the person, taking proper account of the nature of the relationship between the practitioner and the person.

(c) Effective date. This section is applicable on the date that final regulations are published in the Federal Register.

Par. 9. Section 10.25 is revised to read as follows:

(a) Definitions. For purposes of this section—

(1) Assist means to act in such a way as to advise, furnish information to, or otherwise aid another person, directly, or indirectly.

(2) Government employee is an officer or employee of the United States or any agency of the United States, including a special government employee as defined in 18 U.S.C. 202(a), or of the District of Columbia, or of any State, or a member of Congress or of any State legislature.

(3) Member of a firm is a sole practitioner or an employee or associate thereof, or a partner, stockholder, associate, affiliate or employee of a partnership, joint venture, corporation, professional association or other affiliation of two or more practitioners who represent nongovernmental parties.

(4) Particular matter involving specific parties is defined at 5 CFR 2637.201(c), or superseding post-employment regulations issued by the U.S. Office of Government Ethics.

(5) Practitioner includes any individual described in §10.2(a)(5).

(6) Rule includes Treasury regulations, whether issued or under preparation for issuance as notices of proposed rulemaking or as Treasury decisions; revenue rulings; and revenue procedures published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin (see 26 CFR §601.601(d)(2)).

(b) General rules. (1) No former Government employee may, subsequent to his or her Government employment, represent anyone in any matter administered by the Internal Revenue Service if the representation would violate 18 U.S.C. 207 or any other laws of the United States.

(2) No former Government employee who personally and substantially participated in a particular matter involving specific parties may, subsequent to his or her Government employment, represent or knowingly assist, in that particular matter, any person who is or was a specific party to that particular matter.

(3) A former Government employee who within a period of one year prior to the termination of Government employment had official responsibility for a particular matter involving specific parties may not, within two years after his or her Government employment is ended, represent in that particular matter any person who is or was a specific party to that particular matter.

(4) No former Government employee may, within one year after his or her Government employment is ended, appear before any employee of the Treasury Department in connection with the publication, withdrawal, amendment, modification, or interpretation of a rule the development of which the former Government employee participated or for which, within a period of one year prior to the termination of his or her Government employment, the former government employee had official direct responsibility. This paragraph (b)(4) does not, however, preclude such former employee from appearing on his or her own behalf or from representing a taxpayer before the Internal Revenue Service in connection with a particular matter involving specific parties involving the application or interpretation of such a rule with respect to that particular matter, provided that such former employee does not utilize or disclose any confidential information acquired by the former employee in the development of the rule.

(c) Firm representation. (1) No member of a firm of which a former Government employee is a member may represent or knowingly assist a person who was or is a specific party in any particular matter with respect to which the restrictions of paragraph (b)(2) of this section apply to the former Government employee, in that particular matter, unless the firm isolates the former Government employee in such a way to ensure that the former Government employee cannot assist in the representation.

(2) When isolation of a former Government employee is required under paragraph (c)(1) of this section, a statement affirming the fact of such isolation must be executed under oath by the former Government employee and by another member of the firm acting on behalf of the firm. The statement must clearly identify the firm, the former Government employee, and the particular matter(s) requiring isolation. The statement must be retained by the firm and, upon request, provided to the Director of the Office of Professional Responsibility.

(d) Pending representation. The provisions of this regulation will govern practice by former Government employees, their partners and associates with respect to representation in particular matters involving specific parties where actual representation commenced before the effective date of this regulation.

(e) This section is applicable on the date that final regulations are published in the Federal Register.

Par. 10. Section 10.27 is revised to read as follows:

(a) In general. A practitioner may not charge an unconscionable fee in connection with any matter before the Internal Revenue Service.

(b) Contingent fees. (1) Except as provided in paragraphs (b)(2) and (3) of this section, a practitioner may not charge a contingent fee for services rendered in connection with any matter before the Internal Revenue Service.

(2) A practitioner may charge a contingent fee for services rendered in connection with the Service’s examination of, or challenge to—

(i) An original tax return; or

(ii) An amended return or claim for refund or credit filed prior to the taxpayer receiving a written notice of the examination of, or a written challenge to the original tax return.

(3) A practitioner may charge a contingent fee for services rendered in connection with any judicial proceeding arising under the Internal Revenue Code.

(c) Definitions. For purposes of this section—

(1) Contingent fee is any fee that is based, in whole or in part, on whether or not a position taken on a tax return or other filing avoids challenge by the Internal Revenue Service or is sustained either by the Internal Revenue Service or in litigation. A contingent fee includes a fee that is based on a percentage of the refund reported on a return, that is based on a percentage of the taxes saved, or that otherwise depends on the specific result attained. A contingent fee also includes any fee arrangement in which the practitioner will reimburse the client for all or a portion of the client’s fee in the event that a position taken on a tax return or other filing is challenged by the Internal Revenue Service or is not sustained, whether pursuant to an indemnity agreement, a guarantee, rescission rights, or any other arrangement with a similar effect.

(2) Matter before the Internal Revenue Service includes tax planning and advice, preparing or filing or assisting in preparing or filing returns or claims for refund or credit, and all matters connected with a presentation to the Internal Revenue Service or any of its officers or employees relating to a taxpayer’s rights, privileges, or liabilities under laws or regulations administered by the Internal Revenue Service. Such presentations include, but are not limited to, preparing and filing documents, corresponding and communicating with the Internal Revenue Service, rendering written advice with respect to any entity, transaction, plan or arrangement, and representing a client at conferences, hearings, and meetings.

(d) Effective date. This section is applicable on the date that final regulations are published in the Federal Register.

Par. 11. Section 10.29 is revised to read as follows:

(a) Except as provided by paragraph (b) of this section, a practitioner shall not represent a client in his or her practice before the Internal Revenue Service if the representation involves a conflict of interest. A conflict of interest exists if—

(1) The representation of one client will be directly adverse to another client; or

(2) There is a significant risk that the representation of one or more clients will be materially limited by the practitioner’s responsibilities to another client, a former client or a third person or by a personal interest of the practitioner.

(b) Notwithstanding the existence of a conflict of interest under paragraph (a) of this section, the practitioner may represent a client if—

(1) The practitioner reasonably believes that the practitioner will be able to provide competent and diligent representation to each affected client;

(2) The representation is not prohibited by law; and

(3) Each affected client waives the conflict of interest and gives informed consent, confirmed in writing by the affected client, at the time the existence of the conflict of interest is known by the practitioner.

(c) Copies of the written consents must be retained by the practitioner for at least 36 months from the date of the conclusion of the representation of the affected clients, and the written consents must be provided to any officer or employee of the Internal Revenue Service on request.

(d) This section is applicable on the date that final regulations are published in the Federal Register.

Par. 12. Section 10.34 is revised to read as follows:

(a) Tax returns. A practitioner may not sign a tax return as a preparer if the practitioner determines that the tax return contains a position that does not have a realistic possibility of being sustained on its merits (the realistic possibility standard) unless the position is not frivolous and is adequately disclosed to the Internal Revenue Service. A practitioner may not advise a client to take a position on a tax return, or prepare the portion of a tax return on which a position is taken, unless—

(1) The practitioner determines that the position satisfies the realistic possibility standard; or

(2) The position is not frivolous.

(b) Documents, affidavits and other papers. (1) A practitioner may not advise a client to take a position on a document, affidavit or other paper submitted to the Internal Revenue Service unless the position is not frivolous.

(2) A practitioner may not advise a client to submit a document, affidavit or other paper to the Internal Revenue Service—

(i) The purpose of which is to delay or impede the administration of the Federal tax laws;

(ii) That is frivolous or groundless; or

(iii) That contains or omits information in a manner that demonstrates an intentional disregard of a rule or regulation.

(c) Advising clients on potential penalties. (1) A practitioner must inform a client of any penalties that are reasonably likely to apply to the client with respect to—

(i) A position taken on a tax return if—

(A) The practitioner advised the client with respect to the position; or

(B) The practitioner prepared or signed the tax return; and

(ii) Any document, affidavit or other paper submitted to the Internal Revenue Service.

(2) The practitioner also must inform the client of any opportunity to avoid any such penalties by disclosure, if relevant, and of the requirements for adequate disclosure.

(3) This paragraph (c) applies even if the practitioner is not subject to a penalty under the Internal Revenue Code with respect to the position or with respect to the document, affidavit or other paper submitted.

(d) Relying on information furnished by clients. A practitioner advising a client to take a position on a tax return, document, affidavit or other paper submitted to the Internal Revenue Service, or preparing or signing a tax return as a preparer, generally may rely in good faith without verification upon information furnished by the client. The practitioner may not, however, ignore the implications of information furnished to, or actually known by, the practitioner, and must make reasonable inquiries if the information as furnished appears to be incorrect, inconsistent with an important fact or another factual assumption, or incomplete.

(e) Definitions. For purposes of this section:

(1) Realistic possibility. A position is considered to have a realistic possibility of being sustained on its merits if a reasonable and well-informed analysis of the law and the facts by a person knowledgeable in the tax law would lead such a person to conclude that the position has approximately a one in three, or greater, likelihood of being sustained on its merits. The authorities described in 26 CFR 1.6662-4(d)(3)(iii), or any successor provision, of the substantial understatement penalty regulations may be taken into account for purposes of this analysis. The possibility that a tax return will not be audited, that an issue will not be raised on audit, or that an issue will be settled may not be taken into account.

(2) Frivolous. A position is frivolous if it is patently improper.

(f) Effective date. This section is applicable to tax returns, documents, affidavits and other papers filed on or after the date that final regulations are published in the Federal Register.

Par. 13. In §10.35(b)(1) remove the language “§10.2(e)” and add the language “§10.2(a)(5)” in its place.

Par. 14. Section 10.50 is amended by revising paragraph (a) and adding paragraphs (c) and (d) to read as follows:

(a) Authority to censure, suspend, or disbar. The Secretary of the Treasury, or his or her delegate, after notice and an opportunity for a proceeding, may censure, suspend, or disbar any practitioner from practice before the Internal Revenue Service if the practitioner is shown to be incompetent or disreputable (within the meaning of §10.51), fails to comply with any regulation in this part (under the prohibited conduct standards of §10.52), or with intent to defraud, willfully and knowingly misleads or threatens a client or prospective client. Censure is a public reprimand.

* * * * *

(c) Authority to impose monetary penalty—(1) In general. (i) The Secretary of the Treasury, or his or her delegate, after notice and an opportunity for a proceeding, may impose a monetary penalty on any practitioner who engages in conduct subject to sanction under paragraph (a) of this section.

(ii) If the practitioner described in paragraph (c)(1)(i) of this section was acting on behalf of an employer or any firm or other entity in connection with the conduct giving rise to the penalty, the Secretary of the Treasury, or his or her delegate, may impose a monetary penalty on the employer, firm, or entity if it knew, or reasonably should have known, of such conduct.

(2) Amount of penalty. The amount of the penalty shall not exceed the gross income derived (or to be derived) from the conduct giving rise to the penalty.

(3) Coordination with other sanctions. Subject to paragraph (c)(2) of this section—

(i) Any monetary penalty imposed on a practitioner under this paragraph (c) may be in addition to or in lieu of any suspension, disbarment or censure and may be in addition to a penalty imposed on an employer, firm or other entity under paragraph (c)(1)(ii) of this section.

(ii) Any monetary penalty imposed on an employer, firm or other entity may be in addition to penalties imposed under paragraph (c)(1)(i) of this section.

(d) Effective date. This section is applicable to conduct occurring on or after the date that final regulations are published in the Federal Register.

Par. 15. Section 10.51 is revised to read as follows:

(a) Incompetence and disreputable conduct. Incompetence and disreputable conduct for which a practitioner may be sanctioned under §10.50 includes, but is not limited to:

(1) Conviction of any criminal offense under the Federal tax laws.

(2) Conviction of any criminal offense involving dishonesty or breach of trust.

(3) Conviction of any felony under Federal or State law for which the conduct involved renders the practitioner unfit to practice before the Internal Revenue Service.

(4) Giving false or misleading information, or participating in any way in the giving of false or misleading information to the Department of the Treasury or any officer or employee thereof, or to any tribunal authorized to pass upon Federal tax matters, in connection with any matter pending or likely to be pending before them, knowing such information to be false or misleading. Facts or other matters contained in testimony, Federal tax returns, financial statements, applications for enrollment, affidavits, declarations, or any other document or statement, written or oral, are included in the term information.

(5) Solicitation of