IRC 6331(c), Successive Seizures, allows the IRS to levy upon any additional
property after a previous levy has proven to be insufficient to pay the tax. Congress
should amend IRC 6331 (c) by adding the following at the end of paragraph C:
...except that when such seizure is released to the taxpayer
because the taxpayer has paid to the United States the value of the
interest of the United States in the property, or because the value of
the interest of the United States is insufficient to meet the expenses
of sale, the Secretary will be prohibited from making a successive levy
on that same property for the same liability under which the previous
levy was made, for a period of at least 90 days.
Reasons for Change:
The current successive seizure statute is a carte blanche license to harass
taxpayers by continuously seizing the same property after it has been released. This could
occur when the revenue officer is under orders to "maintain pressure" on the
taxpayer "until he gives in and pays." The successive seizure authority can be a
vicious tool when used indiscriminately, or without regard for the personal effects it
would have on the taxpayer.
Adoption of recommendation #3 would require the IRS to release seized property when
the taxpayer pays the value of the U.S. interest in the property or when the value of the
U.S. interest is insufficient to meet the expenses of sale. This proposal tightens up the
successive seizure authority by requiring IRS to wait a reasonable length of time, 90
days, before again seizing the same property that had been previously released for either
of the two given reasons. It is assumed that the 90-day interim period would be used by
the IRS and the taxpayer to devise a constructive plan of action regarding the liability,
and that should the taxpayer prove to be uncooperative and/or uncommunicative during that
period, the right to make a successive seizure would only be allowed after the end of 90
days.
This restriction only applies to a previous seizure that had been released for the
two given reasons. Seizures released for other reasons would not be restricted.