G. Amendments to Title VII of the 1997 Act Relating to Incentives for the
District of Columbia (Sec. 701 of the 1997 Act & secs. 1400, 1400B & 1400C of the Code)

Present Law

Designation of D.C. Enterprise Zone

Certain economically depressed census tracts within the District of Columbia are designated as the "D.C. Enterprise Zone," within which businesses and individual residents are eligible for special tax incentives. The census tracts that compose the D.C. Enterprise Zone for purposes of the wage credit, expensing, and tax-exempt financing incentives include all census tracts that presently are part of the D.C. enterprise community and census tracts within the District of Columbia where the poverty rate is not less than 20 percent. The D.C. Enterprise Zone designation generally will remain in effect for five years for the period from January 1, 1998, through December 31, 2002.

Empowerment zone wage credit, expensing, and tax-exempt financing

The following tax incentives generally are available in the D.C. Enterprise Zone: (1) a 20 percent wage credit for the first $15,000 of wages paid to D.C. residents who work in the D.C. Enterprise Zone; (2) an additional $20,000 of expensing under Code section 179 for qualified zone property placed in service by a "qualified D.C. Zone business"; and (3) special tax-exempt financing for certain zone facilities.

Qualified D.C. Zone business

For purposes of the increased expensing under section 179, as well as for purposes of the zero percent capital gains rate (described below), a corporation or partnership is a qualified D.C. Zone business if: (1) the sole trade or business of the corporation or partnership is the active conduct of a "qualified business" (defined below) within the D.C. Zone; (2) at least 50 percent (80 percent for purposes of the zero percent capital gains rate) of the total gross income of such entity is derived from the active conduct of a qualified business within the D.C. Zone; (3) a substantial portion of the use of the entity's tangible property (whether owned or leased) is within the D.C. Zone; (4) a substantial portion of the entity's intangible property is used in the active conduct of such business; (5) a substantial portion of the services performed for such entity by its employees are performed within the D.C. Zone; and (6) less than 5 percent of the average of the aggregate unadjusted bases of the property of such entity is attributable to (a) certain financial property, or (b) collectibles not held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of an active trade or business. Similar rules apply to a qualified business carried on by an individual as a proprietorship.

In general, a "qualified business" means any trade or business. However, a "qualified business" does not include any trade or business that consists predominantly of the development or holding of intangibles for sale or license. In addition, a qualified business does not include any private or commercial golf course, country club, massage parlor, hot tub facility, suntan facility, racetrack or other facility used for gambling, liquor store, or certain large farms (so-called "excluded businesses"). The rental of residential real estate is not a qualified business. The rental of commercial real estate is a qualified business only if at least 50 percent of the gross rental income from the real property is from qualified D.C. Zone businesses. The rental of tangible personal property to others also is not a qualified business unless at least 50 percent of the rental of such property is by qualified D.C. Zone businesses or by residents of the D.C. Zone.

For purposes of the tax-exempt financing provisions, the term "D.C. Zone business" generally is defined as for purposes of the increased expensing under section 179. However, a qualified D.C. Zone business for purposes of the tax-exempt financing provisions includes a business located in the D.C. Zone that would qualify as a D.C. Zone business if it were separately incorporated. In addition, under a special rule applicable only for purposes of the tax-exempt financing rules, a business is not required to satisfy the requirements applicable to a D.C. Zone business until the end of a startup period if, at the beginning of the startup period, there is a reasonable expectation that the business will be a qualified D.C. Zone business at the end of the startup period and the business makes bona fide efforts to be such a business. With respect to each property financed by a bond issue, the startup period ends at the beginning of the first taxable year beginning more than two years after the later of (1) the date of the bond issue financing such property, or (2) the date the property was placed in service (but in no event more than three years after the date of bond issuance). In addition, if a business satisfies certain requirements applicable to a qualified D.C. Zone business for a three-year testing period following the end of the start-up period and thereafter continues to satisfy certain business requirements, then it will be treated as a qualified D.C. Zone business for all years after the testing period irrespective of whether it satisfies all of the requirements of a qualified D.C. Zone business.

Zero-percent capital gains rate

A zero-percent capital gains rate applies to capital gains from the sale of certain qualified D.C. Zone assets held for more than five years. For purposes of the zero-percent capital gains rate, the D.C. Enterprise Zone is defined to include all census tracts within the District of Columbia where the poverty rate is not less than 10 percent. Only capital gain that is attributable to the 10 year period beginning December 31, 1997, and ending December 31, 2007, is eligible for the zero percent rate.

In general, qualified "D.C. Zone assets" mean stock or partnership interests held in, or tangible property held by, a D.C. Zone business. Such assets must generally be acquired after December 31, 1997, and before January 1, 2003. However, under a special rule, qualified D.C. Zone assets include property that was a qualified D.C. Zone asset in the hands of a prior owner, provided that at the time of acquisition, and during substantially all of the subsequent purchaser's holding period, either (1) substantially all of the use of the property is in a qualified D.C. Zone business, or (2) the property is an ownership interest in a qualified D.C. Zone business.

First-time homebuyer tax credit

First-time homebuyers of a principal residence in the District are eligible for a tax credit of up to $5,000 of the amount of the purchase price, except that the credit phases out for individual taxpayers with adjusted gross income ("AGI") between $70,000 and $90,000 ($110,000 $130,000 for joint filers). The credit is available with respect to property purchased after the date of enactment and before January 1, 2001. Any excess credit may be carried forward indefinitely to succeeding taxable years.

Description of Proposals

Eligible census tracts

The proposal would clarify that the determination of whether a census tract in the District of Columbia satisfies the applicable poverty criteria for inclusion in the D.C. Enterprise Zone for purposes of the wage credit, expensing, and special tax-exempt financing incentives (poverty rate of not less than 20 percent) or for purposes of the zero-percent capital gains rate (poverty rate of not less than 10 percent), would be based on 1990 decennial census data. Thus, data from the 2000 decennial census would not result in the expansion or other reconfiguration of the D.C. Enterprise Zone.

Qualified D.C. Zone business

The proposal would modify section 1400B(c) to clarify that a proprietorship can constitute a D.C. Zone business for purposes of the zero-percent capital gains rate.

The proposal also would clarify that qualified D.C. Zone businesses that take advantage of the special tax-exempt financing incentives do not become subject to a 35-percent zone resident requirement after the close of the testing period.

Zero-percent capital gains rate

The proposal would clarify that there is no requirement that D.C. Zone business property be acquired by a subsequent purchaser prior to January 1, 2003, to be eligible for the special rule applicable to subsequent purchasers.

In addition, the proposal would clarify that the termination of the D.C. Enterprise Zone designation at the end of 2002 will not, by itself, result in property failing to be treated as a qualified D.C. Zone asset for purposes of the zero-percent capital gains rate, provided that the property would otherwise continue to qualify were the D.C. Zone designation in effect.

First-time homebuyer credit

The proposal would clarify that, for purposes of the first-time homebuyer credit, a "first time homebuyer" means any individual if such individual (and, if married, such individual's spouse) did not have a present ownership interest in a principal residence in the District of Columbia during the one-year period ending on the date of the purchase of the principal residence to which the credit applies.

The proposal also would clarify that the phaseout of the credit for individual taxpayers with adjusted gross income between $70,000 and $90,000 ($110,000-$130,000 for joint filers) applies only in the year the credit is generated, and does not apply in subsequent years to which the credit may be carried over.

In addition, the proposal would clarify that the term "purchase price" means the adjusted basis of the principal residence on the date the residence is purchased. Newly constructed residences would be treated as purchased by the taxpayer on the date the taxpayer first occupies such residence.

The proposal would clarify that the first-time homebuyer credit is a nonrefundable personal credit and would provide that the first-time homebuyer credit is claimed after the credits described in Code sections 25 (credit for interest on certain home mortgages) and 23 (adoption credit).

Finally, the proposal would clarify that the first-time homebuyer credit would be available only for property purchased after August 4, 1997, and before January 1, 2001. Thus, the credit would be available to first-time home purchasers who acquire title to a qualifying principal residence on or after August 5, 1997, and on or before December 31, 2000, irrespective of the date the purchase contract was entered into.

Effective Date

The proposal would be effective as of August 5, 1997, the date of enactment of the 1997 Act.

H. Amendments to Title IX of the 1997 Act Relating to Miscellaneous Provisions

1. Clarification of effect of certain transfers to Highway Trust Fund (Sec. 901 of the 1997 Act, and Sec. 9503 of the Code)

Present Law

The 1997 Act provided for the transfer of an additional 4.3 cents per gallon of the highway motor fuels tax revenues from the General Fund to the Highway Trust Fund, and provided that revenues transferred to the Trust Fund under this provision could not be used in a manner resulting in changes in direct spending. The 1997 Act further changed the dates by which certain taxes would be required to be deposited with the Treasury in fiscal year 1998.

Description of Proposal

The proposal would clarify that the tax deposit delays included in the provisions affecting transfers to the Highway Trust Fund, like the revenue transfers themselves, do not affect direct spending from the Trust Fund.

Effective Date

The proposal would be effective as if included in the 1997 Act.

2. Clarification of Mass Transit Account portions of highway motor fuels taxes (Sec. 907 of the 1997 Act, and Sec. 9503 of the Code)

Present Law

The 1997 Act provided for the transfer to the Highway Trust Fund of revenues attributable to a General Fund fuels tax rate of 4.3 cents per gallon. That Act further enacted reduced rates, based on energy content, for propane, liquefied natural tax, compressed natural gas, and methanol produced from natural gas. When deposited in the Highway Trust Fund, revenues from the taxes on each of these products are divided between the Trust Fund's Highway Account and the Mass Transit Account.

Description of Proposal

The proposal would clarify that the Mass Transit Account portion of the highway motor fuels taxes generally is 2.86 cents per gallon and that taxes on the four fuels eligible for reduced rates are divided between the Highway Account and the Mass Transit Account in the same proportion as is the tax on gasoline.

Effective Date

The proposal would be effective as if included in the 1997 Act.

3. Clarification of qualification for reduced rate of tax on certain hard ciders (section 908 of the 1997 Act and section 5041 of the Code)

Present Law

Distilled spirits are taxed at a rate of $13.50 per proof gallon; beer is taxed at a rate of $18 per barrel (approximately 58 cents per gallon); and still wines of 14 percent alcohol or less are taxed at a rate of 1.07 per wine gallon. The Code defines still wines as wines containing not more than 0.392 gram of carbon dioxide per hundred milliliters of wine. Higher rates of tax are applied to wines with greater alcohol content, to sparkling wines (e.g., champagne), and to artificially carbonated wines.

Certain small wineries may claim a credit against the excise tax on wine of 90 cents per wine gallon on the first 100,000 gallons of still wine produced annually (i.e., net tax rate of 17 cents per wine gallon on wines with an alcohol content of 14 percent or less). No credit is allowed on sparkling wines. Certain small breweries pay a reduced tax of $7.00 per barrel (approximately 22.6 cents per gallon) on the first 50,000 barrels of beer produced annually.

Hard cider is a wine fermented solely from apples or apple concentrate and water, containing no other fruit product and containing at least one-half of one percent and less than seven percent alcohol by volume. The 1997 Act provided a lower excise tax rate of 22.6 cents per gallon on hard cider. Qualifying small producers that produce 250,000 gallons or less of hard cider and other wines in a calendar year may claim a credit of 5.6 cents per wine gallon on the first 100,000 gallons of hard cider produced. This credit produces an effective tax rate of 17 cents per gallon, the same effective rate as that applied to small producers of still wines having an alcohol content of 14 percent or less. This credit is phased out for production in excess of 100,000 gallons but less than 250,000 gallons annually.

Description of the Proposal

The proposal would clarify that the 22.6-cents-per-gallon tax rate applies only to apple cider that otherwise would be a still wine.

Effective Date

The proposal would be effective as if included in the 1997 Act.

4. Combined employment tax reporting demonstration project (Sec. 976 of the 1997 Act and Sec. 6103 of the Code)

Present Law

Traditionally, Federal tax forms are filed with the Federal Government and State tax forms are filed with individual states. This necessitates duplication of items common to both returns. Some States have recently been working with the IRS to implement combined State and Federal reporting of certain types of items on one form as a way of reducing the burdens on taxpayers. The State of Montana and the IRS have cooperatively developed a system to combine State and Federal employment tax reporting on one form. The one form would contain exclusively Federal data, exclusively State data, and information common to both: the taxpayer's name, address, TIN, and signature.

The Internal Revenue Code prohibits disclosure of tax returns and return information, except to the extent specifically authorized by the Internal Revenue Code (Sec. 6103). Unauthorized disclosure is a felony punishable by a fine not exceeding $5,000 or imprisonment of not more than five years, or both (Sec. 7213). An action for civil damages also may be brought for unauthorized disclosure (Sec. 7431). No tax information may be furnished by the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") to another agency unless the other agency establishes procedures satisfactory to the IRS for safeguarding the tax information it receives (Sec. 6103(p)).

Implementation of the combined Montana-Federal employment tax reporting project had been hindered because the IRS interprets section 6103 to apply that provision's restrictions on disclosure to information common to both the State and Federal portions of the combined form, although these restrictions would not apply to the State with respect to the State's use of State requested information if that information were supplied separately to both the State and the IRS.

The 1997 Act permits implementation of a demonstration project to assess the feasibility and desirability of expanding combined reporting in the future. There are several limitations on the demonstration project. First, it is limited to the State of Montana and the IRS. Second, it is limited to employment tax reporting. Third, it is limited to disclosure of the name, address, TIN, and signature of the taxpayer, which is information common to both the Montana and Federal portions of the combined form. Fourth, it is limited to a period of five years.

Description of Proposal

The proposal would permit Montana to use this information as if it had collected it separately by eliminating Federal penalties for disclosure of this information. The proposal would also correct a cross-reference to the provision.

Effective Date

The proposal would be effective on the date of enactment of the 1997 Act (August 5, 1997), and will expire on the date five years after the date of enactment of the 1997 Act.

5. Election for 1987 partnerships to continue exception from treatment of publicly traded partnerships as corporations (Sec. 964 of the 1997 Act and Sec. 7704 of the Code)

Present Law

In General

In the case of an electing 1987 partnership that elects to be subject to a 3.5-percent tax on gross income from the active conduct of a trade or business, the general rule treating a publicly traded partnership as a corporation does not apply. The 3.5-percent tax was intended to approximate the corporate tax the partnership would pay if it were treated as a corporation for Federal tax purposes.

Tax on partnership

The 3.5-percent tax is imposed on the electing 1987 partnership under the provision (Sec. 7704(g)(3)). The provision does not specifically make inapplicable, however, the general rule that a partnership as such is not subject to income tax, but rather, the partners are liable for the tax in their separate or individual capacities (Sec. 701).

Estimated tax payments

The provision does not specifically make applicable the requirements for payment of estimated tax that apply generally to payments of corporate tax.

Description of Proposal

Tax on partnership

The proposal would clarify that the general rule of section 701(a) that a partnership as such is not subject to income tax, but rather, the partners are liable for the tax in their separate or individual capacities does not apply to the payment of the 3.5-percent tax by the partnership. Thus, the proposal would clarify that the partnership pays the tax.

Estimated tax payments

The proposal would make applicable to the 3.5-percent tax payable by an electing 1987 partnership the requirements for payment of estimated tax that apply generally to payments of corporate tax.

Effective Date

Tax on partnership

The proposal would be effective as if enacted with the 1997 Act.

Estimated tax payments

The proposal would be effective for taxable years beginning after the date of enactment.

6. Depreciation limitations for electric vehicles (Sec. 971 of the Act and Sec. 280F of the Code)

Present Law

Annual depreciation deductions with respect to passenger automobiles are limited to specified dollar amounts, indexed for inflation. Any cost not recovered during the 6-year recovery period of such vehicles may be recovered during the years succeeding the recovery period, subject to similar limitations. The recovery-period limitations are trebled for vehicles that are propelled primarily by electricity.

Description of Proposal

The depreciation limitations applicable to post-recovery periods would be trebled for vehicles that are propelled primarily by electricity.

Effective Date

The proposal would be effective for property placed in service after August 5, 1997 and before January 1, 2005.

7. Modification of operation of elective carryback of existing net operating losses of the National Railroad Passenger Corporation ("Amtrak") (Sec. 977 of the 1997 Act)

Present Law

The 1997 Act provides elective procedures that allow Amtrak to consider the tax attributes of its predecessors (i.e., those railroads that were relieved of their responsibility to provide intercity rail passenger service as a result of the Rail Passenger Service Act of 1970) in the use of Amtrak's net operating losses. The benefit allowable under these procedures is limited to the least of: (1) 35 percent of Amtrak's existing qualified carryovers, (2) the net tax liability for the carryback period, or (3) $2,323,000,000. One half of the amount so calculated will be treated as a payment of the tax imposed by chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 for Amtrak's taxable year ending December 31, 1997, and a similar amount for Amtrak's taxable year ending December 31, 1998.

The availability of the elective procedures is conditioned on Amtrak (1) agreeing to make payments of one percent of the amount it receives to each of the non-Amtrak States to offset certain transportation related expenditures and (2) using the balance for certain qualified expenses. Non Amtrak States are those States that are not receiving Amtrak service at any time during the period beginning on the date of enactment and ending on the date of payment.

Description of Proposal

The proposal would provide that a State would not lose its status as a non-Amtrak State with respect to any payment by reason of acquiring Amtrak service with any payment from Amtrak under the 1997 Act provision.

Effective Date

The proposal would be effective as if included in section 977 of the 1997 Act.

H. Amendments to Title IX of the 1997 Act Relating to Miscellaneous Provisions

1. Clarification of effect of certain transfers to Highway Trust Fund (Sec. 901 of the 1997 Act, and Sec. 9503 of the Code)

Present Law

The 1997 Act provided for the transfer of an additional 4.3 cents per gallon of the highway motor fuels tax revenues from the General Fund to the Highway Trust Fund, and provided that revenues transferred to the Trust Fund under this provision could not be used in a manner resulting in changes in direct spending. The 1997 Act further changed the dates by which certain taxes would be required to be deposited with the Treasury in fiscal year 1998.

Description of Proposal

The proposal would clarify that the tax deposit delays included in the provisions affecting transfers to the Highway Trust Fund, like the revenue transfers themselves, do not affect direct spending from the Trust Fund.

Effective Date

The proposal would be effective as if included in the 1997 Act.

2. Clarification of Mass Transit Account portions of highway motor fuels taxes (Sec. 907 of the 1997 Act, and Sec. 9503 of the Code)

Present Law

The 1997 Act provided for the transfer to the Highway Trust Fund of revenues attributable to a General Fund fuels tax rate of 4.3 cents per gallon. That Act further enacted reduced rates, based on energy content, for propane, liquefied natural tax, compressed natural gas, and methanol produced from natural gas. When deposited in the Highway Trust Fund, revenues from the taxes on each of these products are divided between the Trust Fund's Highway Account and the Mass Transit Account.

Description of Proposal

The proposal would clarify that the Mass Transit Account portion of the highway motor fuels taxes generally is 2.86 cents per gallon and that taxes on the four fuels eligible for reduced rates are divided between the Highway Account and the Mass Transit Account in the same proportion as is the tax on gasoline.

Effective Date

The proposal would be effective as if included in the 1997 Act.

3. Clarification of qualification for reduced rate of tax on certain hard ciders (section 908 of the 1997 Act and section 5041 of the Code)

Present Law

Distilled spirits are taxed at a rate of $13.50 per proof gallon; beer is taxed at a rate of $18 per barrel (approximately 58 cents per gallon); and still wines of 14 percent alcohol or less are taxed at a rate of 1.07 per wine gallon. The Code defines still wines as wines containing not more than 0.392 gram of carbon dioxide per hundred milliliters of wine. Higher rates of tax are applied to wines with greater alcohol content, to sparkling wines (e.g., champagne), and to artificially carbonated wines.

Certain small wineries may claim a credit against the excise tax on wine of 90 cents per wine gallon on the first 100,000 gallons of still wine produced annually (i.e., net tax rate of 17 cents per wine gallon on wines with an alcohol content of 14 percent or less). No credit is allowed on sparkling wines. Certain small breweries pay a reduced tax of $7.00 per barrel (approximately 22.6 cents per gallon) on the first 50,000 barrels of beer produced annually.

Hard cider is a wine fermented solely from apples or apple concentrate and water, containing no other fruit product and containing at least one-half of one percent and less than seven percent alcohol by volume. The 1997 Act provided a lower excise tax rate of 22.6 cents per gallon on hard cider. Qualifying small producers that produce 250,000 gallons or less of hard cider and other wines in a calendar year may claim a credit of 5.6 cents per wine gallon on the first 100,000 gallons of hard cider produced. This credit produces an effective tax rate of 17 cents per gallon, the same effective rate as that applied to small producers of still wines having an alcohol content of 14 percent or less. This credit is phased out for production in excess of 100,000 gallons but less than 250,000 gallons annually.

Description of the Proposal

The proposal would clarify that the 22.6-cents-per-gallon tax rate applies only to apple cider that otherwise would be a still wine.

Effective Date

The proposal would be effective as if included in the 1997 Act.

4. Combined employment tax reporting demonstration project (Sec. 976 of the 1997 Act and Sec. 6103 of the Code)

Present Law

Traditionally, Federal tax forms are filed with the Federal Government and State tax forms are filed with individual states. This necessitates duplication of items common to both returns. Some States have recently been working with the IRS to implement combined State and Federal reporting of certain types of items on one form as a way of reducing the burdens on taxpayers. The State of Montana and the IRS have cooperatively developed a system to combine State and Federal employment tax reporting on one form. The one form would contain exclusively Federal data, exclusively State data, and information common to both: the taxpayer's name, address, TIN, and signature.

The Internal Revenue Code prohibits disclosure of tax returns and return information, except to the extent specifically authorized by the Internal Revenue Code (Sec. 6103). Unauthorized disclosure is a felony punishable by a fine not exceeding $5,000 or imprisonment of not more than five years, or both (Sec. 7213). An action for civil damages also may be brought for unauthorized disclosure (Sec. 7431). No tax information may be furnished by the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") to another agency unless the other agency establishes procedures satisfactory to the IRS for safeguarding the tax information it receives (Sec. 6103(p)).

Implementation of the combined Montana-Federal employment tax reporting project had been hindered because the IRS interprets section 6103 to apply that provision's restrictions on disclosure to information common to both the State and Federal portions of the combined form, although these restrictions would not apply to the State with respect to the State's use of State requested information if that information were supplied separately to both the State and the IRS.

The 1997 Act permits implementation of a demonstration project to assess the feasibility and desirability of expanding combined reporting in the future. There are several limitations on the demonstration project. First, it is limited to the State of Montana and the IRS. Second, it is limited to employment tax reporting. Third, it is limited to disclosure of the name, address, TIN, and signature of the taxpayer, which is information common to both the Montana and Federal portions of the combined form. Fourth, it is limited to a period of five years.

Description of Proposal

The proposal would permit Montana to use this information as if it had collected it separately by eliminating Federal penalties for disclosure of this information. The proposal would also correct a cross-reference to the provision.

Effective Date

The proposal would be effective on the date of enactment of the 1997 Act (August 5, 1997), and will expire on the date five years after the date of enactment of the 1997 Act.

5. Election for 1987 partnerships to continue exception from treatment of publicly traded partnerships as corporations (Sec. 964 of the 1997 Act and Sec. 7704 of the Code)

Present Law

In General

In the case of an electing 1987 partnership that elects to be subject to a 3.5-percent tax on gross income from the active conduct of a trade or business, the general rule treating a publicly traded partnership as a corporation does not apply. The 3.5-percent tax was intended to approximate the corporate tax the partnership would pay if it were treated as a corporation for Federal tax purposes.

Tax on partnership

The 3.5-percent tax is imposed on the electing 1987 partnership under the provision (Sec. 7704(g)(3)). The provision does not specifically make inapplicable, however, the general rule that a partnership as such is not subject to income tax, but rather, the partners are liable for the tax in their separate or individual capacities (Sec. 701).

Estimated tax payments

The provision does not specifically make applicable the requirements for payment of estimated tax that apply generally to payments of corporate tax.

Description of Proposal

Tax on partnership

The proposal would clarify that the general rule of section 701(a) that a partnership as such is not subject to income tax, but rather, the partners are liable for the tax in their separate or individual capacities does not apply to the payment of the 3.5-percent tax by the partnership. Thus, the proposal would clarify that the partnership pays the tax.

Estimated tax payments

The proposal would make applicable to the 3.5-percent tax payable by an electing 1987 partnership the requirements for payment of estimated tax that apply generally to payments of corporate tax.

Effective Date

Tax on partnership

The proposal would be effective as if enacted with the 1997 Act.

Estimated tax payments

The proposal would be effective for taxable years beginning after the date of enactment.

6. Depreciation limitations for electric vehicles (Sec. 971 of the Act and Sec. 280F of the Code)

Present Law

Annual depreciation deductions with respect to passenger automobiles are limited to specified dollar amounts, indexed for inflation. Any cost not recovered during the 6-year recovery period of such vehicles may be recovered during the years succeeding the recovery period, subject to similar limitations. The recovery-period limitations are trebled for vehicles that are propelled primarily by electricity.

Description of Proposal

The depreciation limitations applicable to post-recovery periods would be trebled for vehicles that are propelled primarily by electricity.

Effective Date

The proposal would be effective for property placed in service after August 5, 1997 and before January 1, 2005.

7. Modification of operation of elective carryback of existing net operating losses of the National Railroad Passenger Corporation ("Amtrak") (Sec. 977 of the 1997 Act)

Present Law

The 1997 Act provides elective procedures that allow Amtrak to consider the tax attributes of its predecessors (i.e., those railroads that were relieved of their responsibility to provide intercity rail passenger service as a result of the Rail Passenger Service Act of 1970) in the use of Amtrak's net operating losses. The benefit allowable under these procedures is limited to the least of: (1) 35 percent of Amtrak's existing qualified carryovers, (2) the net tax liability for the carryback period, or (3) $2,323,000,000. One half of the amount so calculated will be treated as a payment of the tax imposed by chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 for Amtrak's taxable year ending December 31, 1997, and a similar amount for Amtrak's taxable year ending December 31, 1998.

The availability of the elective procedures is conditioned on Amtrak (1) agreeing to make payments of one percent of the amount it receives to each of the non-Amtrak States to offset certain transportation related expenditures and (2) using the balance for certain qualified expenses. Non Amtrak States are those States that are not receiving Amtrak service at any time during the period beginning on the date of enactment and ending on the date of payment.

Description of Proposal

The proposal would provide that a State would not lose its status as a non-Amtrak State with respect to any payment by reason of acquiring Amtrak service with any payment from Amtrak under the 1997 Act provision.

Effective Date

The proposal would be effective as if included in section 977 of the 1997 Act.