[4830-01-u] DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Internal Revenue Service 26 CFR Parts 26, 301 and 602 [TD 8644] RIN 1545-AJ11 RIN 1545-AL75 RIN 1545-AO89 Generation-Skipping Transfer Tax AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service, Treasury ACTION: Final and temporary regulations SUMMARY: This document contains final generation-skipping transfer (GST) tax regulations under chapter 13 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code), as added by section 1431 of the Tax Reform Act of 1986. Changes to the applicable law were made by the Tax Reform Act of 1986, the Technical and Miscellaneous Revenue Act of 1988, and the Revenue Reconciliation Act of 1989. The regulations are necessary to provide guidance to taxpayers so that they may comply with chapter 13 of the Code. DATES: These regulations are effective December 27, 1995. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James F. Hogan, (202) 622-3090 (not a toll free number). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Paperwork Reduction Act The collection of information requirements contained in these final regulations have been reviewed and approved by the Office of Management and Budget in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3507) under control numbers 1545-0985 (relating to 26.2601-1 and 26.2662-2) and 1545-1358 (relating to 26.2632-1, 26.2642-1, 26.2642-2, 26.2642-3, 26.2642-4 and 26.2652-2). All of these paperwork requirements will be consolidated under control number 1545-0985. Responses to this collection of information are required to ensure the proper collection of the generation-skipping transfer tax. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection unless the collection of information displays a valid control number. The estimated burden per respondent is 1 hour under control number 1545-0985. The time estimates for the reporting and recordkeeping requirements under control number 1545-1358 are included in the estimates of burden applicable to Forms 706, 706NA, 706GS(T), 706GS(D), 706GS(D-1), and 709. Comments concerning the accuracy of this burden estimate and suggestions for reducing this burden should be directed to the Internal Revenue Service, Attn: IRS Reports Clearance Officer T:FP, Washington, DC 20224, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Attn: Desk Officer for the Department of Treasury, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Washington, DC 20503. Books or records relating to this collection of information must be retained as long as their contents may become material in the administration of any internal revenue law. Generally, tax returns and tax return information are confidential, as required by 26 U.S.C. 6103. Background On March 15, 1988, the IRS published in the Federal Register a notice of proposed rulemaking (53 FR 8469) by cross reference to Temporary Regulations published on the same date in the Federal Register (53 FR 8441) under 2601 and 2662. Subsequently, on December 24, 1992, the IRS published a second notice of proposed rulemaking (57 FR 61353) amending the prior notice. Also, on December 24, 1992, the IRS published a notice of proposed rulemaking in the Federal Register (57 FR 61356) containing proposed regulations under 2611, 2612, 2613, 2632, 2641, 2642, 2652, 2653, 2654, and 2663. The IRS received written and oral comments on the proposed regulations and, on April 21, 1993, a public hearing was held. These documents adopt final regulations with respect to these notices of proposed rulemaking. The following is a discussion of the more significant revisions that were made. Section 2601 - Transitional Rules Transfers after September 25, 1985 and before October 23, 1986 Section 26.2601-1(a)(2)(i), relating to inter vivos transfers made after September 25, 1985, and before October 23, 1986, clarifies that chapter 13 applies to inter vivos transfers that are subject to chapter 12 even though a gift tax is not actually paid because of, for example, the marital deduction or the unified credit. Section 26.2601-1(a)(2)(ii) (which treats inter vivos transfers made after September 25, 1985, and before October 23, 1986, as if made on October 23, 1986) clarifies that the value of the transferred property for purposes of chapter 13 is determined as of the actual transfer date rather than as of the deemed transfer date of October 23, 1986. Section 26.2601-1(a)(4) adds an example illustrating that 26.2601-1(a)(2) does not apply to transfers made under a revocable trust that becomes irrevocable by reason of the grantor's death after September 25, 1985, but before October 23, 1986. Those transfers are not subject to chapter 13 because they are in the nature of testamentary transfers that occurred prior to October 23, 1986. Section 26.2601-1(b)(1)(ii)(C) clarifies that incidents of ownership in an insurance policy that are relinquished before September 25, 1985, are not to be taken into account in determining whether a trust is irrevocable for purposes of 26.2601-1(b)(1), which exempts trusts that were irrevocable on September 25, 1985, from the provisions of chapter 13. Under 26.2601-1(b)(1)(iii)(A), a qualified terminable interest property (QTIP) trust that is grandfathered under 26.2601-1(b)(1) is treated as if the reverse QTIP election had been made under section 2652(a)(3). Example 1 in 26.2601- 1(b)(1)(iii)(B) has been revised to illustrate that the initial QTIP election under section 2523(f) need not be made before September 25, 1985, provided that the trust was irrevocable on that date. Further, 26.2601-1(b)(1)(v)(C) has been revised to provide that in the case of a trust with respect to which a reverse QTIP election is deemed to have been made, the failure to exercise the right of reimbursement under section 2207A will not be treated as a constructive addition to the trust. This conforms the treatment of trusts that are irrevocable on September 25, 1985, with the rule provided in 26.2652-1(a)(3) which applies to trusts created after September 25, 1985. In 26.2601-1(b)(2)(iv)(B), the phrase "or to a generation- skipping trust" has been added to eliminate any implication that the provision is limited to situations involving direct skips. The provision applies to all generation-skipping transfers. Section 26.2601-1(b)(3)(iii) applies the transitional rules where the decedent was under a mental disability but had not been adjudged a mental incompetent. This section has been clarified to provide that any evidence submitted to establish the decedent's state of incompetency is not conclusive and is subject to examination. In addition, an example has been added to illustrate the transitional rules applicable in the case of mental incompetency. Uniform statutory rule against perpetuities The notice of proposed rulemaking published on December 24, 1992, (57 FR 61353) contained a proposed modification to 26.2601-1(b)(1)(v)(B)(2). Section 26.2601-1(b)(1)(v)(B)(2) provided that the exercise of a nongeneral power of appointment will not be treated as an addition to a grandfathered GST trust if the power is exercised in a manner that may not postpone or suspend the vesting, absolute ownership, or power of alienation of a interest in property for a period, measured from the date of creation of the trust, extending beyond any life in being at the date of creation of the trust plus a period of 21 years (perpetuities period). The proposed modification to 26.2601-1(b)(1)(v)(B)(2), which is finalized in this document, provides that the exercise of a nongeneral power of appointment that validly postpones or suspends the vesting, absolute ownership, or power of alienation of an interest in property for a term of years that will not exceed 90 years (measured from the date of creation of the trust) will not be considered an exercise that postpones vesting, etc., beyond the perpetuities period. The modification takes into account the fact that many states have adopted the Uniform Statutory Rule Against Perpetuities (USRAP) which allows either a 90 year perpetuities period or the common law perpetuities period. Under 26.2601-1(b)(1)(v)(B)(2), as modified, the nongeneral power may not be exercised in a manner that postpones vesting, etc., for the longer of 90 years or the common law period (lives in being plus 21 years). The discussion in the preamble published on December 24, 1992, indicates that USRAP has a "wait and see" aspect that is not appropriate for GST purposes because it will be necessary to determine the GST tax consequences of distributions and terminations at the time they occur. Thus, the preamble stated that, in order to comply with the regulation and avoid a constructive addition, it must be clear at the time the nongeneral power is exercised that the exercise may not postpone or suspend vesting, etc., beyond either lives in being plus 21 years or 90 years (but not the longer of the two periods). A commentator has pointed out that the USRAP invalidates any attempt to exercise a power for the longer of the two periods. Under the USRAP, it will be clear at the time the nongeneral power is exercised that the exercise may not postpone or suspend vesting, etc., beyond one of the two periods (but not both). Under the USRAP, the common law period (lives in being plus 21 years) is imposed in the event that the power holder exercises the power in a manner that attempts to suspend or postpone vesting, etc., for the longer of the two periods. Although the preamble published on December 24, 1992, may have been misleading in referring to a "wait and see" aspect of USRAP, the modification to 26.2601-1(b)(1)(v)(B)(2) is not affected. Section 2611 et. seq. - GST substantive rules Definition of generation-skipping transfers Section 26.2611-1 has been revised to clarify that, in determining whether an event is subject to the GST tax, reference must be made to the most recent transfer that was subject to Federal estate or gift tax. This is because the most recent transfer that was subject to estate or gift tax establishes the identity of the transferor, which in turn determines the identity of the skip persons and non-skip persons. Definitions Section 26.2612-1(a)(2)(i) of the proposed regulations provides generally that, for purposes of determining whether a transfer constitutes a direct skip, the generation assignment of a person who would otherwise be a skip person is redetermined by disregarding the intervening generation, if certain individuals have died prior to the transfer (e.g., a predeceased child of the transferor). The section has been modified to provide that, if an individual who is a member of the intervening generation dies no later than 90 days after the transfer, the deceased individual is treated as having predeceased the transferor, if the governing instrument or applicable state law provides for such treatment. Section 26.2612-1(a)(2)(ii) has been added to provide that, if a transferor makes an addition to an existing trust after the death of an individual described in paragraph (a)(2)(i) of that section (i.e., an individual in the intervening generation), the additional property is treated as being held in a separate trust for purposes of chapter 13. Section 2612(a)(1) defines the term taxable termination to mean the termination of an interest in property held in trust unless, among other things, at no time after such termination may a distribution (including distributions on termination) be made from the trust to a skip person. Section 26.2612-1(b)(1)(iii), as proposed, has been revised to provide that, for purposes of applying this rule, potential distributions to skip persons are to be disregarded if the probability of occurrence is so remote as to be negligible. A similar rule has been applied to 26.2612-1(d)(2), regarding when a trust is considered a skip person. The probability that a distribution will occur is so remote as to be negligible only if it can be ascertained by actuarial standards that there is less than a 5 percent probability that the distribution will occur. Section 26.2612-1(c)(2) has been added to clarify that the look-through rule in section 2651(e)(2) does not apply for purposes of determining whether a transfer from one trust to another trust is a taxable distribution. Thus, the transfer is treated as having been made to the recipient trust rather than to the beneficiaries of that trust. Accordingly, a transfer is a taxable distribution only if the recipient trust itself is a skip person. Section 26.2612-1(e)(3) has been added to provide that, in determining whether a trust is a skip person, trust interests disclaimed pursuant to a qualified disclaimer described in section 2518 are not taken into account. Example 3 has been added to 26.2612-1(f) to illustrate that a transfer to a trust pursuant to which a beneficiary who is a skip person has a withdrawal power is not a direct skip unless the trust is a skip person. Example 9 has been added to 26.2612-1(f) to illustrate that a taxable termination may occur upon the distribution of the entire trust property (less amounts retained to pay a resulting GST tax and administration expenses). Example 14 contained in 26.2612-1(f) of the proposed regulations illustrates that an individual is not treated as having an interest in a trust for purposes of Chapter 13, if the individual's support obligation could be satisfied at the discretion of the trustee. This example has been renumbered as Example 15 and has been clarified to provide that an individual will have an interest in the trust if the trustee is required to make distributions for the beneficiary's support, in satisfaction of the individual's support obligation. Allocation of GST exemption Under 26.2632-1(b)(2)(ii)(A) of the proposed regulations, a late allocation of GST exemption is effective on the date the Form 709 reporting the allocation is filed, and is deemed to precede in point of time any taxable event occurring on that date. This section has been revised to specify that the Form 709 is treated as filed on the date it is mailed to the appropriate IRS Service Center. Further, the late allocation may be made on a timely filed Form 709 reporting another transfer. Section 26.2632-1(b)(2)(ii)(B) has been added to clarify how the GST exemption allocated on a Federal gift tax return (Form 709) is to be apportioned in the event that the amount allocated on the return exceeds the value of the transfers reported on the return. Example 4 of 26.2632-1(b)(2)(iii) of the proposed regulations has been revised to better illustrate the effective date of a late allocation of GST exemption. Example 5 of 26.2632-1(b)(2)(iii) has been added to illustrate the automatic allocation of GST exemption to inter vivos direct skips in situations where split gift treatment is elected on an initial gift tax return filed after its due date. Section 26.2632-1(d)(1) has been revised to provide that a late allocation of GST exemption made by an executor with respect to an inter vivos transfer not included in the gross estate, is effective as of the date the allocation is filed. This rule does not apply to any automatic allocation under section 2632(b)(1). This revision conforms the regulation to section 2642(b)(3). Estate tax inclusion period As proposed, 26.2632-1(c)(2)(ii) provided that an estate tax inclusion period (ETIP) exists during the period in which the transferred property would have been includible in the transferor's gross estate had the transferor retained an interest held by the transferor's spouse, but only to the extent the spouse acquired the interest from the transferor in an inter vivos transfer that was not included in the transferor's taxable gifts or for which a deduction was allowed under section 2523. Commentators stated that there was no support in the statute for this spousal rule, and any such rule would require a legislative change. The final regulations eliminate this spousal rule and Example 5 of 26.2632-1(c)(5). Section 26.2632-1(c)(2)(ii)(A) has been added to provide that the ETIP rules do not apply when the possibility that the property will be included in the gross estate of the transferor (or the transferor's spouse) is so remote as to be negligible. Further, 26.2632-1(c)(2)(ii)(B) has been added to provide that transferred property will not be treated as being subject to inclusion in the transferor's spouse's gross estate, and thus, subject to an ETIP, where the only power possessed by the spouse is a right to withdraw no more than the greater of 5 percent or $5,000 of the trust's corpus and the withdrawal right terminates within 60 days of the transfer to the trust. Section 26.2632-1(c)(5) Example 3, of the proposed regulations illustrates that if a transferor's spouse elects gift-splitting treatment with respect to the transferor's gift that is subject to an ETIP, the spouse is treated as the transferor of one-half of the gift. The example has been expanded to illustrate that, since the spouse's deemed transfer is subject to an ETIP, if the spouse dies prior to the termination of the trust, the spouse's executor may allocate GST exemption to the trust. However, the allocation will not be effective until the ETIP terminates on the transferor's death. Erroneous allocations Under the proposed regulations, allocations in excess of the amount of the property transferred are void. This treatment has been expanded under the final regulations. Thus, any allocation to a trust that has no GST potential at the time of the allocation, with respect to the transferor for whom the allocation is made, is also void. This provision is intended to prevent the wasting of GST exemption because of an erroneous allocation with respect to a testamentary or inter vivos transfer. A trust will have no GST potential only if there is no possibility that a GST will be made from the trust with respect to the transferor. Determination of applicable fraction Section 26.2642-1(b)(2) of the proposed regulations provided rules for determining the inclusion ratio with respect to a trust subject to an ETIP where GSTs are made from the trust during the ETIP. Comments were received that the rules were unclear regarding whether an ineffective allocation, i.e., an allocation made prior to any distributions or terminations, would apply in determining the amount of the transferor's unused GST exemption, or whether such an allocation could be modified prior to an ETIP termination. In response to the comments, 26.2632-1(c)(1) (providing rules for the allocation of exemption with respect to a trust subject to an ETIP) and 26.2642-1(b)(2) clarify that an allocation made to a trust subject to an ETIP prior to any distribution or termination is not subject to modification or revocation. However, the allocation will not be effective, i.e., the allocation does not operate to fix the inclusion ratio of the trust, at the time it is made. Rather, the allocation becomes effective as of the date of a subsequent distribution or termination. Section 26.2632-1(c)(5) Example 2, illustrates this point. Section 26.2642-2 of the proposed regulations provides valuation rules for determining the denominator of the applicable fraction under section 2642. Section 26.2642-2(a)(1) of the final regulations specifies that, in the case of a timely allocation of GST exemption with respect to an inter vivos transfer, the denominator of the applicable fraction is the fair market value of the transferred property, as finally determined for gift tax purposes. Section 26.2642-2(b)(1) of the proposed regulations provides special rules for determining the denominator of the applicable fraction in situations involving property subject to the special valuation rules contained in section 2032A. Under the proposed regulations, the special use value of the property could only be used in determining the applicable fraction if the property was transferred in a direct skip. Thus, a generation-skipping trust to which section 2032A property was transferred in a transfer that was not a direct skip would not receive the benefit of the favorable valuation rules of section 2032A in determining the applicable fraction with respect to the trust. Comments stated that the proposed regulation was inconsistent with section 2642(b), which provides that the chapter 11 value must be used to determine the applicable fraction in the case of a testamentary transfer. Under the final regulations, the section 2032A value of property is to be used to determine the applicable fraction for a direct skip transfer and for a generation-skipping trust created in a transfer other than a direct skip. In the event that additional estate tax is imposed under section 2032A(c) with respect to the property, then the applicable fraction is redetermined as of the transferor's date of death. Thus, the GST tax liability with respect to any direct skip, taxable termination, or taxable distribution occurring prior to the recapture event would be recomputed based on the redetermined applicable fraction, and an additional GST tax would be due. The taxation of any future GST transfers would also be based on the redetermined applicable fraction. Sections 26.2642-2(b)(2) and (3) of the proposed regulations contain special rules for determining the denominator of the applicable fraction in situations involving residuary and pecuniary payments. Generally, in the case of a residual GST after the payment of a pecuniary amount, the denominator of the applicable fraction will be the estate tax value of the total assets available to satisfy the pecuniary payment less the amount of the pecuniary payment, provided the pecuniary payment carries "appropriate interest" as defined in 26.2642-2(b)(4). Under 26.2642-2(b)(4)(ii), the payment need not carry appropriate interest if, inter alia, the payment is irrevocably "set aside" within 15 months of the transferor's death. The final regulations clarify that this exception to the appropriate interest requirement applies only if the entire payment is set aside. Further, the payment is treated as set aside if the amount is segregated and held in a separate account pending distribution. Finally, under the proposed regulation, the appropriate interest requirement can be satisfied if a pro rata share of estate income is allocated to the pecuniary bequest. The final regulations clarify that the payment of income may be allocated pursuant to the terms of the governing instrument or applicable local law. Section 26.2642-4(a)(3) of the proposed regulations addresses a situation where a lifetime allocation is made with respect to a trust when the trust was not subject to an ETIP, and the trust is subsequently included in the transferor's gross estate. The regulation has been revised to provide that, if additional GST exemption is allocated to the trust, the nontax portion of the trust is determined immediately after the date of the transferor's death. Also, if additional GST exemption is not allocated to the trust by the transferor's executor, the applicable fraction does not change, if the trust was not otherwise subject to an ETIP at the time the previous allocation of GST exemption was made. Further, where such property is included in the gross estate, the denominator of the applicable fraction is reduced to reflect any federal or state estate or inheritance tax paid by the trust. Definition of transferor Section 26.2652-1(a)(1) of the proposed regulations, defining transferor, has been revised to specify that a surviving spouse is treated as the transferor of a qualified domestic trust (QDOT) described in section 2056A that is included in the surviving spouse's gross estate for federal estate tax purposes, assuming the trust is not subject to a reverse QTIP election under section 2652(a)(3). The surviving spouse is also the transferor of any QDOT created by the surviving spouse under section 2056(d)(2)(B). Section 26.2652-1(a)(4), as proposed, provided that the creator of a special power of appointment will be treated as making a transfer subject to estate or gift tax (and thus be considered a transferor) if the holder of the power exercised the power in a manner that may postpone vesting, etc., of the property subject to the power beyond the permissible perpetuities period. This result is inconsistent with section 2041(a)(3), which treats the holder of the power as making a transfer under these circumstances. Accordingly, the regulation has been revised to provide that the holder of the power will be treated as making a taxable transfer, if the holder exercises the power in the manner prescribed. Section 26.2652-1(a)(5) has been added to specify that where a donor's spouse consents to have the donor's gift treated as made one-half by the spouse, then for purposes of chapter 13, the spouse is treated as the transferor of one-half of the property transferred by the donor. Thus, if a donor transfers property to a trust and retains a qualified interest as defined in section 2702(b), with the remainder to a grandchild, a consenting spouse would be treated as the transferor of one-half the entire property. It was suggested that the spouse should only be treated as the transferor of that portion of the trust corresponding to one-half of the actuarial value of the interest passing to the grandchild, since under section 2513, only one- half the gift to the grandchild may be treated as made by the consenting spouse. However, treating the consenting spouse as the transferor of one-half of the entire trust is consistent with the general treatment accorded other split-interest transfers. For example, if a transferor transferred property in trust retaining an interest that qualified under section 2702(b), with the remainder to the transferor's grandchild, the transferor would be considered the transferor of the entire trust for purposes of chapter 13, notwithstanding that, from a technical standpoint, only the actuarial value of the gift to the grandchild is subject to gift tax at the time of the transfer. Example 8 in 26.2652-1(a)(6) has been added illustrating that a surviving spouse will not be treated as making a contribution to a QTIP trust that is included in the spouse's gross estate and is subject to a reverse QTIP election, where the spouse directs in the will that the estate tax generated by the inclusion of the trust is to be paid from the spouse's probate estate. Separate shares treated as separate trusts Section 26.2654-1 of the proposed regulations provides rules under which "separate shares" of a single trust that satisfy the requirements of the regulations will be recognized as separate trusts for GST purposes. Under the proposed regulations, a mandatory payment of a pecuniary amount is treated as a separate share of a trust (and thus, a separate trust for GST purposes) if certain conditions are satisfied. The section is clarified to specify that a mandatory payment is a payment that is nondiscretionary and noncontingent; i.e., the payment must be made in all events. A sentence was added to Example 3, now contained in 26.2654-1(a)(5), to clarify that, where a decedent's probate estate pours over to a revocable trust, and then amounts are distributed pursuant to the terms of the trust, the distributions will be treated as separate shares for purposes of chapter 13. Example 4, now contained in 26.2654-1(a)(5), has been revised to specify that the bequest of a pecuniary amount payable in kind is not treated as a separate share of the trust, since, under the facts presented, neither the trust nor local law requires that the assets distributed in satisfaction of the bequest fairly reflect net appreciation and depreciation. This is the result regardless of whether the assets are distributed within 15 months of the transferor's death. Comments received suggested that the regulations should allow separate trust treatment whenever a single inter vivos trust was recognized as separate trusts under local law. For example, an inter vivos trust provides income to child for life, but when each grandchild reaches age 35, a separate trust is to be established for the child, the grandchild, and the grandchild's issue. Comments suggested that the Service should recognize each trust established when a grandchild reaches age 35 as a separate trust, and allow a late allocation of GST exemption specifically to that trust when severance occurs. This suggestion was rejected. Generally, the adoption of this approach would effectively allow the allocation of GST exemption to specific distributions from a GST trust, rather than to the entire trust. This result would be contrary to the clear language of the statute. See, e.g., sections 2642(a)(1)(A) and (a)(2). Division of a single trust into separate trusts Under 26.2654-1(c) of the proposed regulations, a testamentary trust could be severed into several parts, provided the severance was commenced prior to the filing of the estate tax return. Further, the new trusts created pursuant to the severance had to be identical to the old trusts. For example, a testamentary trust providing for income to spouse, remainder to be divided equally between child and grandchild could only be severed into two trusts both providing income to spouse with the remainder to be divided between child and grandchild. Finally, an inter vivos trust could not be severed unless it consisted of separate shares, or different transferors had contributed to the trust. The regulation has been clarified to specify that the division of a single trust that is included in the transferor's gross estate will be recognized if either: (1) the single trust consists of separate shares and is thus, treated as separate trusts; or (2) the single trust, although not consisting of separate shares, is severed into separate trusts pursuant to a direction in the governing instrument providing that the trust is to be divided into separate trusts on the transferor's death; or (3) the governing instrument does not require or direct severance but the trust is severed pursuant to the discretionary authority of the trustee granted under the governing instrument or local law. The final regulations provide that the trusts resulting from the severance of a single testamentary trust need not be identical. Thus, if the trust provides income to spouse, remainder to child and grandchild, the trust may be severed to create two trusts, one with income to spouse, remainder to child and a second with income to spouse remainder to grandchild. This result could be achieved through proper estate planning in any event. However, the regulations make it clear that the resulting trusts must provide for the same succession of interests as provided for under the original trust. Thus, a trust providing for an income interest to a child, with remainder to a grandchild, could not be divided into one trust for the child (equal in value to the child's income interest) and another for the grandchild. The proposed regulations provided that the new trusts must be funded with a fractional share of each and every asset held by the original single trust. The provision has been revised to provide that the new trusts may also be funded on a nonpro rata basis, based on the fair market value of the assets selected on the date of severance. Thus, the executor or trustee may select the assets with which to fund each trust, and need not fractionalize each asset. An example has been added to illustrate that, if a revocable trust included in the transferor's gross estate is, under the terms of the trust, divided into multiple trusts on the transferor's death, then each trust established will be treated as a separate trust for GST purposes. Due date of return New 26.2662-1(d)(2) has been added to provide that the due date of the return with respect to a taxable termination subject to an election under section 2624(c) (relating to alternate valuation in accordance with section 2032) is April 15th of the following year in which the taxable termination occurred or on or before the 15th day of the tenth month following the month in which the death that resulted in the taxable termination occurred, whichever is later. Application of chapter 13 to nonresident aliens Section 2663(2) requires that the Commissioner prescribe regulations, consistent with the provisions of chapters 11 and 12, providing for the application of the GST tax to a nonresident alien (NRA). In general, under 26.2663-2(b) as proposed, the GST tax applied to inter vivos and testamentary direct skip transfers by a NRA, to the extent that the transferred property was U.S. situs property such that the transfer was subject to a gift tax (in the case of inter vivos transfers) or an estate tax (in the case of testamentary transfers). Similarly, in the case of transfers in trust, chapter 13 applied to taxable terminations and distributions to the extent the initial transfer to the trust (whether inter vivos or testamentary) consisted of U.S. situs property, such that the initial transfer was subject to the gift or estate tax. This was the case regardless of the situs of the property at the time of the actual distribution or termination and regardless of the residency or citizenship of the skip person receiving the beneficial interest or property. Under 26.2663-2(c) as proposed, if the property involved in a generation-skipping transfer was not situated in the U.S. at the time of the initial transfer, the generation-skipping transfer was still subject to the GST tax if: (1) at the time of the direct skip, taxable termination or distribution, the property passes to a skip person who is a U.S. resident or citizen; and (2) at the time of the initial transfer to the skip person or trust, a lineal descendant of the transferor, who is a lineal ancestor of the skip person, was a resident or citizen of the U.S. This rule applied regardless of the situs of the property at the time of the actual distribution or termination. Section 26.2663-2(f) of the proposed regulations provided for the automatic allocation of a NRA's $1,000,000 GST exemption regardless of whether the transfer was a direct skip. Thus, the proposed regulations subjected non-U.S. situs property to the GST tax based on the status of the skip person/recipient of the property at the time the property was received, and the status of the generation that was skipped at the time of the initial transfer to the trust or skip person. Many comments were critical of this approach. In general, these comments emphasized that the estate and gift tax provisions subject transfers by NRAs to transfer tax based on the situs of the property, not the status of the recipient. Therefore, the proposed regulations conflict with section 2663, which provides that the regulations should be consistent with the principles of chapters 11 and 12 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code). Further, the commentators argued that treating a NRA who transfers non- U.S. situs property as a transferor for GST tax purposes would conflict with the definition of transferor under section 2652, since the transfer would not be subject to estate or gift tax. Under section 2652, an individual is a transferor only to the extent the transfer is subject to U.S. gift tax or estate tax. The proposed regulations have been revised to address these concerns. Thus, the rules in the proposed regulations applying chapter 13 to transfers of property that were not subject to estate or gift tax have been eliminated. Under the final regulations, the application of the GST tax will be limited to situations where an estate or gift tax is imposed on the property. Thus, the GST tax will apply to inter vivos and testamentary direct skip transfers by a NRA transferor to the extent a gift tax is imposed on the transfer (in the case of an inter vivos transfer) or the transferred property is included in the transferor's gross estate (in the case of a testamentary direct skip). In the case of taxable terminations and taxable distributions, chapter 13 will apply to the extent a gift tax was imposed on the initial transfer to the trust, or the property was included in the transferor's gross estate. Accordingly, under the final regulations (in the absence of a situation involving an ETIP), the application of Chapter 13 is generally dependent on the situs of the property at the time of the initial transfer. The regulations contain special rules for determining the applicable fraction and inclusion ratio where a trust is funded with both U.S. and foreign situs property. In general, the rules of 26.2632-1 apply with respect to the allocation of the exemption. However, the ETIP rule provided in 26.2632-1(c) applies only if the property transferred by the NRA is subsequently included in the transferor's gross estate. The final regulations provide transitional relief with respect to NRA's who made GST transfers and relied on the automatic allocation rules in the proposed regulations. Special Analyses It has been determined that this Treasury decision is not a significant regulatory action as defined in EO 12866. Therefore, a regulatory assessment is not required. It has also been determined that section 553(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 5) and the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6) do not apply to these regulations, and therefore, a Regulatory Flexibility Analysis is not required. Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the Internal Revenue Code, the notice of proposed rulemaking preceding these regulations was submitted to the Small Business Administration for comment on its impact on small business. Drafting Information The principal author of these regulations is James F. Hogan, Office of the Chief Counsel, IRS. Other personnel from the IRS and Treasury Department participated in their development. List of Subjects 26 CFR Part 26 Estate taxes, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. 26 CFR Part 301 Employment taxes, Estate taxes, Excise taxes, Gift taxes, Income taxes, Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. 26 CFR part 602 Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Adoption of Amendments to the Regulations Accordingly, 26 CFR parts 26, 301, and 602 are amended as follows: Paragraph 1. Part 26 is revised to read as follows: PART 26--GENERATION-SKIPPING TRANSFER TAX REGULATIONS UNDER THE TAX REFORM ACT OF 1986 26.2600-1 Table of contents. 26.2601-1 Effective dates. 26.2611-1 Generation-skipping transfer defined. 26.2612-1 Definitions. 26.2613-1 Skip person. 26.2632-1 Allocation of GST exemption. 26.2641-1 Applicable rate of tax. 26.2642-1 Inclusion ratio. 26.2642-2 Valuation. 26.2642-3 Special rule for charitable lead annuity trusts. 26.2642-4 Redetermination of applicable fraction. 26.2642-5 Finality of inclusion ratio. 26.2652-1 Transferor defined; other definitions. 26.2652-2 Special election for qualified terminable interest property. 26.2653-1 Taxation of multiple skips. 26.2654-1 Certain trusts treated as separate trusts. 26.2662-1 Generation-skipping transfer tax return requirements. 26.2663-1 Recapture tax under section 2032A. 26.2663-2 Application of chapter 13 to transfers by nonresidents not citizens of the United States. Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 and 26 U.S.C. 2663. Section 26.2632-1 also issued under 26 U.S.C. 2632 and 2663. Section 26.2642-4 also issued under 26 U.S.C. 2632 and 2663. Section 26.2662-1 also issued under 26 U.S.C. 2662. Section 26.2663-2 also issued under 26 U.S.C. 2632 and 2663. 26.2600-1 Table of contents. 26.2601-1 Effective dates. (a) Transfers subject to the generation-skipping transfer tax. (1) In general. (2) Certain transfers treated as if made after October 22, 1986. (3) Certain trust events treated as if occurring after October 22, 1986. (4) Example. (b) Exceptions. (1) Irrevocable trusts. (2) Transition rule for wills or revocable trusts executed before October 22, 1986. (3) Transition rule in the case of mental incompetency. (4) Exceptions to additions rule. (c) Additional effective dates. 26.2611-1 Generation-skipping transfer defined. 26.2612-1 Definitions. (a) Direct skip. (1) In general. (2) Special rule for certain lineal descendants. (b) Taxable termination. (1) In general. (2) Partial termination. (c) Taxable distribution. (1) In general. (2) Look-through rule not to apply. (d) Skip person. (e) Interest in trust. (1) In general. (2) Exceptions. (f) Examples. 26.2613-1 Skip person. 26.2632-1 Allocation of GST exemption. (a) General rule. (b) Lifetime allocations. (1) Automatic allocation to direct skips. (2) Allocation to other transfers. (c) Special rules during an estate tax inclusion period. (1) In general. (2) Estate tax inclusion period defined. (3) Termination of an ETIP. (4) Treatment of direct skips. (5) Examples. (d) Allocations after the transferor's death. (1) Allocation by executor. (2) Automatic allocation after death. 26.2641-1 Applicable rate of tax. 26.2642-1 Inclusion ratio. (a) In general. (b) Numerator of applicable fraction. (1) In general. (2) GSTs occurring during an ETIP. (c) Denominator of applicable fraction. (1) In general. (2) Zero denominator. (3) Nontaxable gifts. (d) Examples. 26.2642-2 Valuation. (a) Lifetime transfers. (1) In general. (2) Special rule for late allocations during life. (b) Transfers at death. (1) In general. (2) Special rule for pecuniary payments. (3) Special rule for residual transfers after payment of a pecuniary payment. (4) Appropriate interest. (c) Examples. 26.2642-3 Special rule for charitable lead annuity trusts. (a) In general. (b) Adjusted GST exemption defined. (c) Example. 26.2642-4 Redetermination of applicable fraction. (a) In general. (1) Multiple transfers to a single trust. (2) Consolidation of separate trusts. (3) Property included in transferor's gross estate. (4) Imposition of recapture tax under section 2032A. (b) Examples. 26.2642-5 Finality of inclusion ratio. (a) Direct skips. (b) Other GSTs. 26.2652-1 Transferor defined; other definitions. (a) Transferor defined. (1) In general. (2) Transfers subject to Federal estate or gift tax. (3) Special rule for certain QTIP trusts. (4) Exercise of certain nongeneral powers of appointment. (5) Split-gift transfers. (6) Examples. (b) Trust defined. (1) In general. (2) Examples. (c) Trustee defined. (d) Executor defined. (e) Interest in trust. 26.2652-2 Special election for qualified terminable interest property. (a) In general. (b) Time and manner of making election. (c) Transitional rule. (d) Examples. 26.2653-1 Taxation of multiple skips. (a) General rule. (b) Examples. 26.2654-1 Certain trusts treated as separate trusts. (a) Single trust treated as separate trusts. (1) Substantially separate and independent shares. (2) Multiple transferors with respect to a single trust. (3) Severance of a single trust. (4) Allocation of exemption. (5) Examples. (b) Division of a trust included in the gross estate. (1) In general. (2) Special rule. (3) Allocation of exemption. (4) Example. 26.2662-1 Generation-skipping transfer tax return requirements. (a) In general. (b) Form of return. (1) Taxable distributions. (2) Taxable terminations. (3) Direct skip. (c) Person liable for tax and required to make return. (1) In general. (2) Special rule for direct skips occurring at death with respect to property held in trust arrangements. (3) Limitation on personal liability of trustee. (4) Exceptions. (d) Time and manner of filing return. (1) In general. (2) Exceptions. (e) Place for filing returns. (f) Lien on property. 26.2663-1 Recapture tax under section 2032A. 26.2663-2 Application of chapter 13 to transfers by nonresidents not citizens of the United States. (a) In general. (b) Transfers subject to Chapter 13. (1) Direct skips. (2) Taxable distributions and taxable terminations. (c) Trusts funded in part with property subject to Chapter 13 and in part with property not subject to Chapter 13. (1) In general. (2) Nontax portion of the trust. (3) Special rule with respect to estate tax inclusion period. (d) Examples. (e) Transitional rule for allocations for transfers made before December 27, 1995. 26.2601-1 Effective dates. (a) Transfers subject to the generation-skipping transfer tax--(1) In general. Except as otherwise provided in this section, the provisions of chapter 13 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (Code) apply to any generation-skipping transfer (as defined in section 2611) made after October 22, 1986. (2) Certain transfers treated as if made after October 22, 1986. Solely for purposes of chapter 13, an inter vivos transfer is treated as if it were made on October 23, 1986, if it was-- (i) Subject to chapter 12 (regardless of whether a tax was actually incurred or paid); and (ii) Made after September 25, 1985, but before October 23, 1986. For purposes of this paragraph, the value of the property transferred shall be the value of the property on the date the property was transferred. (3) Certain trust events treated as if occurring after October 22, 1986. For purposes of chapter 13, if an inter vivos transfer is made to a trust after September 25, 1985, but before October 23, 1986, any subsequent distribution from the trust or termination of an interest in the trust that occurred before October 23, 1986, is treated as occurring immediately after the deemed transfer on October 23, 1986. If more than one distribution or termination occurs with respect to a trust, the events are treated as if they occurred on October 23, 1986, in the same order as they occurred. See paragraph (b)(1)(iv)(B) of this section for rules determining the portion of distributions and terminations subject to tax under chapter 13. This paragraph (a)(3) does not apply to transfers to trusts not subject to chapter 13 by reason of the transition rules in paragraphs (b)(2) and (3) of this section. The provisions of this paragraph (a)(3) do not apply in determining the value of the property under chapter 13. (4) Example. The following example illustrates the principle that paragraph (a)(2) of this section is not applicable to transfers under a revocable trust that became irrevocable by reason of the transferor's death after September 25, 1985, but before October 23, 1986: Example. T created a revocable trust on September 30, 1985, that became irrevocable when T died on October 10, 1986. Although the trust terminated in favor of a grandchild of T, the transfer to the grandchild is not treated as occurring on October 23, 1986, pursuant to paragraph (a)(2) of this section because it is not an inter vivos transfer subject to chapter 12. The transfer is not subject to chapter 13 because it is in the nature of a testamentary transfer that occurred prior to October 23, 1986. (b) Exceptions--(1) Irrevocable trusts--(i) In general. The provisions of chapter 13 do not apply to any generation-skipping transfer under a trust (as defined in section 2652(b)) that was irrevocable on September 25, 1985. The rule of the preceding sentence does not apply to a pro rata portion of any generation- skipping transfer under an irrevocable trust if additions are made to the trust after September 25, 1985. See paragraph (b)(1)(iv) of this section for rules for determining the portion of the trust that is subject to the provisions of chapter 13. (ii) Irrevocable trust defined--(A) In general. Unless otherwise provided in either paragraph (b)(1)(ii)(B) or (C) of this section, any trust (as defined in section 2652(b)) in existence on September 25, 1985, is considered an irrevocable trust. (B) Property includible in the gross estate under section 2038. For purposes of this chapter a trust is not an irrevocable trust to the extent that, on September 25, 1985, the settlor held a power with respect to such trust that would have caused the value of the trust to be included in the settlor's gross estate for Federal estate tax purposes by reason of section 2038 (without regard to powers relinquished before September 25, 1985) if the settlor had died on September 25, 1985. A trust is considered subject to a power on September 25, 1985, even though the exercise of the power was subject to the precedent giving of notice, or even though the exercise could take effect only on the expiration of a stated period, whether or not on or before September 25, 1985, notice had been given or the power had been exercised. A trust is not considered subject to a power if the power is, by its terms, exercisable only on the occurrence of an event or contingency not subject to the settlor's control (other than the death of the settlor) and if the event or contingency had not in fact taken place on September 25, 1985. (C) Property includible in the gross estate under section 2042. A policy of insurance on an individual's life that is treated as a trust under section 2652(b) is not considered an irrevocable trust to the extent that, on September 25, 1985, the insured possessed any incident of ownership (as defined in 20.2042-1(c) of this chapter, and without regard to any incidents of ownership relinquished before September 25, 1985), that would have caused the value of the trust, (i.e., the insurance proceeds) to be included in the insured's gross estate for Federal estate tax purposes by reason of section 2042, if the insured had died on September 25, 1985. (D) Examples. The following examples illustrate the application of this paragraph (b)(1): Example 1. Section 2038 applicable. On September 25, 1985, T, the settlor of a trust that was created before September 25, 1985, held a testamentary power to add new beneficiaries to the trust. T held no other powers over any portion of the trust. The testamentary power held by T would have caused the trust to be included in T's gross estate under section 2038 if T had died on September 25, 1985. Therefore, the trust is not an irrevocable trust for purposes of this section. Example 2. Section 2038 not applicable when power held by a person other than settlor. On September 25, 1985, S, the spouse of the settlor of a trust in existence on that date, had an annual right to withdraw a portion of the principal of the trust. The trust was otherwise irrevocable on that date. Because the power was not held by the settlor of the trust, it is not a power described in section 2038. Thus, the trust is considered an irrevocable trust for purposes of this section. Example 3. Section 2038 not applicable. In 1984, T created a trust and retained the right to expand the class of remaindermen to include any of T's afterborn grandchildren. As of September 25, 1985, all of T's grandchildren were named remaindermen of the trust. Since the exercise of T's power was dependent on there being afterborn grandchildren who were not members of the class of remaindermen, a contingency that did not exist on September 25, 1985, the trust is not considered subject to the power on September 25, 1985, and is an irrevocable trust for purposes of this section. The result is not changed even if grandchildren are born after September 25, 1985, whether or not T exercises the power to expand the class of remaindermen. Example 4. Section 2042 applicable. On September 25, 1985, T purchased an insurance policy on T's own life and designated child, C, and grandchild, GC, as the beneficiaries. T retained the power to obtain from the insurer a loan against the surrender value of the policy. T's insurance policy is a trust (as defined in section 2652(b)) for chapter 13 purposes. The trust is not considered an irrevocable trust because, on September 25, 1985, T possessed an incident of ownership that would have caused the value of the policy to be included in T's gross estate under section 2042 if T had died on that date. Example 5. Trust partially irrevocable. In 1984, T created a trust naming T's grandchildren as the income and remainder beneficiaries. T retained the power to revoke the trust as to one-half of the principal at any time prior to T's death. T retained no other powers over the trust principal. T did not die before September 25, 1985, and did not exercise or release the power before that date. The half of the trust not subject to T's power to revoke is an irrevocable trust for purposes of this section. (iii) Trust containing qualified terminable interest property--(A) In general. For purposes of chapter 13, a trust described in paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section that holds qualified terminable interest property by reason of an election under section 2056(b)(7) or section 2523(f) (made either on, before or after September 25, 1985) is treated in the same manner as if the decedent spouse or the donor spouse (as the case may be) had made an election under section 2652(a)(3). Thus, transfers from such trusts are not subject to chapter 13, and the decedent spouse or the donor spouse (as the case may be) is treated as the transferor of such property. The rule of this paragraph (b)(1)(iii) does not apply to that portion of the trust that is subject to chapter 13 by reason of an addition to the trust occurring after September 25, 1985. See 26.2652-2(a) for rules where an election under section 2652(a)(3) is made. See 26.2652-2(c) for rules where a portion of a trust is subject to an election under section 2652(a)(3). (B) Examples. The following examples illustrate the application of this paragraph (b)(1)(iii): Example 1. QTIP election made after September 25, 1985. On March 28, 1985, T established a trust. The trust instrument provided that the trustee must distribute all income annually to T's spouse, S, during S's life. Upon S's death, the remainder is to be distributed to GC, the grandchild of T and S. On April 15, 1986, T elected under section 2523(f) to treat the property in the trust as qualified terminable interest property. On December 1, 1987, S died and soon thereafter the trust assets were distributed to GC. Because the trust was irrevocable on September 25, 1985, the transfer to GC is not subject to tax under chapter 13. T is treated as the transferor with respect to the transfer of the trust assets to GC in the same manner as if T had made an election under section 2652(a)(3) to reverse the effect of the section 2523(f) election for chapter 13 purposes. Example 2. Section 2652(a)(3) election deemed to have been made. Assume the same facts as in Example 1, except the trust instrument provides that after S's death all income is to be paid annually to C, the child of T and S. Upon C's death, the remainder is to be distributed to GC. C died on October 1, 1992, and soon thereafter the trust assets are distributed to GC. Because the trust was irrevocable on September 25, 1985, the termination of C's interest is not subject to chapter 13. (iv) Additions to irrevocable trusts--(A) In general. If an addition is made after September 25, 1985, to an irrevocable trust which is excluded from chapter 13 by reason of paragraph (b)(1) of this section, a pro rata portion of subsequent distributions from (and terminations of interests in property held in) the trust is subject to the provisions of chapter 13. If an addition is made, the trust is thereafter deemed to consist of two portions, a portion not subject to chapter 13 (the non- chapter 13 portion) and a portion subject to chapter 13 (the chapter 13 portion), each with a separate inclusion ratio (as defined in section 2642(a)). The non-chapter 13 portion represents the value of the assets of the trust as it existed on September 25, 1985. The applicable fraction (as defined in section 2642(a)(2)) for the non-chapter 13 portion is deemed to be 1 and the inclusion ratio for such portion is 0. The chapter 13 portion of the trust represents the value of all additions made to the trust after September 25, 1985. The inclusion ratio for the chapter 13 portion is determined under section 2642. This paragraph (b)(1)(iv)(A) requires separate portions of one trust only for purposes of determining inclusion ratios. For purposes of chapter 13, a constructive addition under paragraph (b)(1)(v) of this section is treated as an addition. See paragraph (b)(4) of this section for exceptions to the additions rule of this paragraph (b)(1)(iv). See 26.2654-1(a)(2) for rules treating additions to a trust by an individual other than the initial transferor as a separate trust for purposes of chapter 13. (B) Terminations of interests in and distributions from trusts. Where a termination or distribution described in section 2612 occurs with respect to a trust to which an addition has been made, the portion of such termination or distribution allocable to the chapter 13 portion is determined by reference to the allocation fraction, as defined in paragraph (b)(1)(iv)(C) of this section. In the case of a termination described in section 2612(a) with respect to a trust, the portion of such termination that is subject to chapter 13 is the product of the allocation fraction and the value of the trust (to the extent of the terminated interest therein). In the case of a distribution described in section 2612(b) from a trust, the portion of such distribution that is subject to chapter 13 is the product of the allocation fraction and the value of the property distributed. (C) Allocation fraction--(1) In general. The allocation fraction allocates appreciation and accumulated income between the chapter 13 and non-chapter 13 portions of a trust. The numerator of the allocation fraction is the amount of the addition (valued as of the date the addition is made), determined without regard to whether any part of the transfer is subject to tax under chapter 11 or chapter 12, but reduced by the amount of any Federal or state estate or gift tax imposed and subsequently paid by the recipient trust with respect to the addition. The denominator of the allocation fraction is the total value of the entire trust immediately after the addition. For purposes of this paragraph (b)(1)(iv)(C), the total value of the entire trust is the fair market value of the property held in trust (determined under the rules of section 2031), reduced by any amount attributable to or paid by the trust and attributable to the transfer to the trust that is similar to an amount that would be allowable as a deduction under section 2053 if the addition had occurred at the death of the transferor, and further reduced by the same amount that the numerator was reduced to reflect Federal or state estate or gift tax incurred by and subsequently paid by the recipient trust with respect to the addition. Where there is more than one addition to principal after September 25, 1985, the portion of the trust subject to chapter 13 after each such addition is determined pursuant to a revised fraction. In each case, the numerator of the revised fraction is the sum of the value of the chapter 13 portion of the trust immediately before the latest addition, and the amount of the latest addition. The denominator of the revised fraction is the total value of the entire trust immediately after the addition. If the transfer to the trust is a generation-skipping transfer, the numerator and denominator are reduced by the amount of the generation-skipping transfer tax, if any, that is imposed by chapter 13 on the transfer and actually recovered from the trust. The allocation fraction is rounded off to five decimal places (.00001). (2) Examples. The following examples illustrate the application of paragraph (b)(1)(iv) of this section. In each of the examples, assume that the recipient trust does not pay any Federal or state transfer tax by reason of the addition. Example 1. Post September 25, 1985, addition to trust. (i) On August 16, 1980, T established an irrevocable trust. Under the trust instrument, the trustee is required to distribute the entire income annually to T's child, C, for life, then to T's grandchild, GC, for life. Upon GC's death, the remainder is to be paid to GC's issue. On October 1, 1986, when the total value of the entire trust is $400,000, T transfers $100,000 to the trust. The allocation fraction is computed as follows: Value of addition $100,000 컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴 = 컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴� = .2 Total value of trust $400,000 + $100,000 (ii) Thus, immediately after the transfer, 20 percent of the value of future generation-skipping transfers under the trust will be subject to chapter 13. Example 2. Effect of expenses. Assume the same facts as in Example 1, except immediately prior to the transfer on October 1, 1986, the fair market value of the individual assets in the trust totaled $400,000. Also, assume that the trust had accrued and unpaid debts, expenses, and taxes totaling $300,000. Assume further that the entire $300,000 represented amounts that would be deductible under section 2053 if the trust were includible in the transferor's gross estate. The numerator of the allocation fraction is $100,000 and the denominator of the allocation fraction is $200,000 (($400,000 - $300,000) + $100,000). Thus, the allocation fraction is .5 ($100,000/$200,000) and 50 percent of the value of future generation-skipping transfers will be subject to chapter 13. Example 3. Multiple additions. (i) Assume the same facts as in Example 1, except on January 30, 1988, when the total value of the entire trust is $600,000, T transfers an additional $40,000 to the trust. Before the transfer, the value of the portion of the trust that was attributable to the prior addition was $120,000 ($600,000 x .2). The new allocation fraction is computed as follows: Total value of additions 컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴 = Total value of trust $120,000 + $40,000 $160,000 컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴 = 컴컴컴컴 = .25 $600,000 + $40,000 $640,000 (ii) Thus, immediately after the transfer, 25 percent of the value of future generation-skipping transfers under the trust will be subject to chapter 13. Example 4. Allocation fraction at time of generation- skipping transfer. Assume the same facts as in Example 3, except on March 1, 1989, when the value of the trust is $800,000, C dies. A generation-skipping transfer occurs at C's death because of the termination of C's life estate. Therefore, $200,000 ($800,000 x .25) is subject to tax under chapter 13. (v) Constructive additions--(A) Powers of Appointment. Except as provided in paragraph (b)(1)(v)(B) of this section, where any portion of a trust remains in the trust after the post- September 25, 1985, release, exercise, or lapse of a power of appointment over that portion of the trust, and the release, exercise, or lapse is treated to any extent as a taxable transfer under chapter 11 or chapter 12, the value of the entire portion of the trust subject to the power that was released, exercised, or lapsed is treated as if that portion had been withdrawn and immediately retransferred to the trust at the time of the release, exercise, or lapse. The creator of the power will be considered the transferor of the addition except to the extent that the release, exercise, or lapse of the power is treated as a taxable transfer under chapter 11 or chapter 12. See 26.2652-1 for rules for determining the identity of the transferor of property for purposes of chapter 13. (B) Special rule for certain powers of appointment. The release, exercise, or lapse of a power of appointment (other than a general power of appointment as defined in 2041(b)) is not treated as an addition to a trust if-- (1) Such power of appointment was created in an irrevocable trust that is not subject to chapter 13 under paragraph (b)(1) of this section; and (2) In the case of an exercise, the power of appointment is not exercised in a manner that may postpone or suspend the vesting, absolute ownership or power of alienation of an interest in property for a period, measured from the date of creation of the trust, extending beyond any life in being at the date of creation of the trust plus a period of 21 years plus, if necessary, a reasonable period of gestation (the perpetuities period). For purposes of this paragraph (b)(1)(v)(B)(2), the exercise of a power of appointment that validly postpones or suspends the vesting, absolute ownership or power of alienation of an interest in property for a term of years that will not exceed 90 years (measured from the date of creation of the trust) will not be considered an exercise that postpones or suspends vesting, absolute ownership or the power of alienation beyond the perpetuities period. If a power is exercised by creating another power, it is deemed to be exercised to whatever extent the second power may be exercised. (C) Constructive addition if liability is not paid out of trust principal. Where a trust described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section is relieved of any liability properly payable out of the assets of such trust, the person or entity who actually satisfies the liability is considered to have made a constructive addition to the trust in an amount equal to the liability. The constructive addition occurs when the trust is relieved of liability (e.g., when the right of recovery is no longer enforceable). But see 26.2652-1(a)(3) for rules involving the application of section 2207A in the case of an election under section 2652(a)(3). (D) Examples. The following examples illustrate the application of this paragraph (b)(1)(v): Example 1. Lapse of a power of appointment. On June 19, 1980, T established an irrevocable trust with a corpus of $500,000. The trust instrument provides that the trustee shall distribute the entire income from the trust annually to T's spouse, S, during S's life. At S's death, the remainder is to be distributed to T and S's grandchild, GC. T also gave S a general power of appointment over one-half of the trust assets. On December 21, 1989, when the value of the trust corpus is $1,500,000, S died without having exercised the general power of appointment. The value of one-half of the trust corpus, $750,000 ($1,500,000 x .5) is included in S's gross estate under section 2041(a) and is subject to tax under Chapter 11. Because the value of one-half of the trust corpus is subject to tax under Chapter 11 with respect to S's estate, S is treated as the transferor of that property for purposes of Chapter 13 (see section 2652(a)(1)(A)). For purposes of the generation-skipping transfer tax, the lapse of S's power of appointment is treated as if $750,000 ($1,500,000 x .5) had been distributed to S and then transferred back to the trust. Thus, S is considered to have added $750,000 ($1,500,000 x .5) to the trust at the date of S's death. Because this constructive addition occurred after September 25, 1985, 50 percent of the corpus of the trust became subject to Chapter 13 at S's death. Example 2. Multiple actual additions. On June 19, 1980, T established an irrevocable trust with a principal of $500,000. The trust instrument provides that the trustee shall distribute the entire income from the trust annually to T's spouse, S, during S's life. At S's death, the remainder is to be distributed to GC, the grandchild of T and S. On October 1, 1985, when the trust assets were valued at $800,000, T added $200,000 to the trust. After the transfer on October 1, 1985, the allocation fraction was .2 ($200,000/$1,000,000). On December 21, 1989, when the value of the trust principal is $1,000,000, T adds $1,000,000 to the trust. After this addition, the new allocation fraction is 0.6 ($1,200,000/$2,000,000). The numerator of the fraction is the value of that portion of trust assets that were subject to chapter 13 immediately prior to the addition (by reason of the first addition), $200,000 (.2 x $1,000,000), plus the value of the second transfer, $1,000,000, which equals $1,200,000. The denominator of the fraction, $2,000,000, is the total value of the trust assets immediately after the second transfer. Thus, 60 percent of the principal of the trust becomes subject to chapter 13. Example 3. Entire portion of trust subject to lapsed power is treated as an addition. On September 25, 1985, B possessed a general power of appointment over the assets of an irrevocable trust that had been created by T in 1980. Under the terms of the trust, B's power lapsed on July 20, 1987. For Federal gift tax purposes, B is treated as making a gift of ninety-five percent (100% - 5%) of the value of the principal (see section 2514). However, because the entire trust was subject to the power of appointment, 100 percent (that portion of the trust subject to the power) of the assets of the trust are treated as a constructive addition. Thus, the entire amount of all generation-skipping transfers occurring pursuant to the trust instrument after July 20, 1987, are subject to chapter 13. Example 4. Exercise of power of appointment in favor of another trust. On March 1, 1985, T established an irrevocable trust as defined in paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section. Under the terms of the trust instrument, the trustee is required to distribute the entire income annually to T's child, C, for life, then to T's grandchild, GC, for life. GC has the power to appoint any or all of the trust assets to Trust 2 which is an irrevocable trust (as defined in paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section) that was established on August 1, 1985. The terms of Trust 2's governing instrument provide that the trustee shall pay income to T's great grandchild, GGC, for life. Upon GGC's death, the remainder is to be paid to GGC's issue. GGC was alive on March 1, 1985, when Trust 1 was created. C died on April 1, 1986. On July 1, 1987, GC exercised the power of appointment. The exercise of GC's power does not subject future transfers from Trust 2 to tax under chapter 13 because the exercise of the power in favor of Trust 2 does not suspend the vesting, absolute ownership, or power of alienation of an interest in property for a period, measured from the date of creation of Trust 1, extending beyond the life of GGC (a beneficiary under Trust 2 who was in being at the date of creation of Trust 1) plus a period of 21 years. The result would be the same if Trust 2 had been created after the effective date of chapter 13. Example 5. Exercise of power of appointment in favor of another trust. Assume the same facts as in Example 4, except that GGC was born on March 28, 1986. The valid exercise of GC's power in favor of Trust 2 causes the principal of Trust 1 to be subject to chapter 13, because GGC was not born until after the creation of Trust 1. Thus, such exercise may suspend the vesting, absolute ownership, or power of alienation of an interest in the trust principal for a period, measured from the date of creation of Trust 1, extending beyond the life of GGC (a beneficiary under Trust 2 who was not a life in being at the date of creation of Trust 1). Example 6. Extension for the longer of two periods. Prior to the effective date of chapter 13, GP established an irrevocable trust under which the trust income was to be paid to GP's child, C, for life. C was given a testamentary power to appoint the remainder in further trust for the benefit of C's issue. In default of C's exercise of the power, the remainder was to pass to charity. C died on February 3, 1995, survived by a child who was alive when GP established the trust. C exercised the power in a manner that validly extends the trust in favor of C's issue until the later of May 15, 2064 (80 years from the date the trust was created), or the death of C's child plus 21 years. C's exercise of the power is a constructive addition to the trust because the exercise may extend the trust for a period longer than the permissible periods of either the life of C's child (a life in being at the creation of the trust) plus 21 years or a term not more than 90 years measured from the creation of the trust. On the other hand, if C's exercise of the power could extend the trust based only on the life of C's child plus 21 years or only for a term of 80 years from the creation of the trust (but not the later of the two periods) then the exercise of the power would not have been a constructive addition to the trust. Example 7. Extension for the longer of two periods. The facts are the same as in Example 6 except local law provides that the effect of C's exercise is to extend the term of the trust until May 15, 2064, whether or not C's child predeceases that date by more than 21 years. C's exercise is not a constructive addition to the trust because C exercised the power in a manner that cannot postpone or suspend vesting, absolute ownership, or power of alienation for a term of years that will exceed 90 years. The result would be the same if the effect of C's exercise is either to extend the term of the trust until 21 years after the death of C's child or to extend the term of the trust until the first to occur of May 15, 2064 or 21 years after the death of C's child. (vi) Appreciation and income. Except to the extent that the provisions of paragraphs (b)(1)(iv) and (v) of this section allocate subsequent appreciation and accumulated income between the original trust and additions thereto, appreciation in the value of the trust and undistributed income added thereto are not considered an addition to the principal of a trust. (2) Transition rule for wills or revocable trusts executed before October 22, 1986--(i) In general. The provisions of chapter 13 do not apply to any generation-skipping transfer under a will or revocable trust executed before October 22, 1986, provided that-- (A) The document in existence on October 21, 1986, is not amended at any time after October 21, 1986, in any respect which results in the creation of, or an increase in the amount of, a generation-skipping transfer; (B) In the case of a revocable trust, no addition is made to the revocable trust after October 21, 1986, that results in the creation of, or an increase in the amount of, a generation-skipping transfer; and (C) The decedent dies before January 1, 1987. (ii) Revocable trust defined. For purposes of this section, the term revocable trust means any trust (as defined in section 2652(b)) except to the extent that, on October 22, 1986, the trust-- (A) Was an irrevocable trust described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section; or (B) Would have been an irrevocable trust described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section had it not been created or become irrevocable after September 25, 1985, and before October 22, 1986. (iii) Will or revocable trust containing qualified terminable interest property. The rules contained in paragraph (b)(1)(iii) of this section apply to any will or revocable trust within the scope of the transition rule of this paragraph (b)(2). (iv) Amendments to will or revocable trust. For purposes of this paragraph (b)(2), an amendment to a will or a revocable trust in existence on October 21, 1986, is not considered to result in the creation of, or an increase in the amount of, a generation-skipping transfer where the amendment is-- (A) Basically administrative or clarifying in nature and only incidentally increases the amount transferred; or (B) Designed to ensure that an existing bequest or transfer qualifies for the applicable marital or charitable deduction for estate, gift, or generation-skipping transfer tax purposes and only incidentally increases the amount transferred to a skip person or to a generation-skipping trust. (v) Creation of, or increase in the amount of, a GST. In determining whether a particular amendment to a will or revocable trust creates, or increases the amount of, a generation-skipping transfer for purposes of this paragraph (b)(2), the effect of the instrument(s) in existence on October 21, 1986, is measured against the effect of the instrument(s) in existence on the date of death of the decedent or on the date of any prior generation- skipping transfer. If the effect of an amendment cannot be immediately determined, it is deemed to create, or increase the amount of, a generation-skipping transfer until a determination can be made. (vi) Additions to revocable trusts. Any addition made after October 21, 1986, but before the death of the settlor, to a revocable trust subjects all subsequent generation-skipping transfers under the trust to the provisions of chapter 13. Any addition made to a revocable trust after the death of the settlor (if the settlor dies before January 1, 1987) is treated as an addition to an irrevocable trust. See paragraph (b)(1)(v) of this section for rules involving constructive additions to trusts. See paragraph (b)(1)(v)(B) of this section for rules providing that certain transfers to trusts are not treated as additions for purposes of this section. (vii) Examples. The following examples illustrate the application of paragraph (b)(2)(iv) of this section: (A) Facts applicable to Examples 1 through 5. In each of Examples 1 through 5 assume that T executed a will prior to October 22, 1986, and that T dies on December 31, 1986. Example 1. Administrative change. On November 1, 1986, T executes a codicil to T's will removing one of the co-executors named in the will. Although the codicil may have the effect of lowering administrative costs and thus increasing the amount transferred, it is considered administrative in nature and thus does not cause generation-skipping transfers under the will to be subject to chapter 13. Example 2. Effect of amendment not immediately determinable. On November 1, 1986, T executes a codicil to T's will revoking a bequest of $100,000 to C, a non-skip person (as defined under section 2613(b)) and causing that amount to be added to a residuary trust held for a skip person. The amendment is deemed to increase the amount of a generation-skipping transfer and prevents any transfers under the will from qualifying under paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section. If, however, C dies before T and under local law the property would have been added to the residue in any event because the bequest would have lapsed, the codicil is not considered an amendment that increases the amount of a generation-skipping transfer. Example 3. Refund of tax paid because of amendment. T's will provided that an amount equal to the maximum allowable marital deduction would pass to T's spouse with the residue of the estate passing to a trust established for the benefit of skip persons. On October 23, 1986, the will is amended to provide that the marital share passing to T's spouse shall be the lesser of the maximum allowable marital deduction or the minimum amount that will result in no estate tax liability for T's estate. The amendment may increase the amount of a generation-skipping transfer. Therefore, any generation-skipping transfers under the will are subject to tax under chapter 13. If it becomes apparent that the amendment does not increase the amount of a generation- skipping transfer, a claim for refund may be filed with respect to any generation-skipping transfer tax that was paid within the period set forth in section 6511. For example, it would become apparent that the amendment did not result in an increase in the residue if it is subsequently determined that the maximum marital deduction and the minimum amount that will result in no estate tax liability are equal in amount. Example 4. An amendment that increases a generation- skipping transfer causes complete loss of exempt status. T's will provided for the creation of two trusts for the benefit of skip persons. On November 1, 1986, T executed a codicil to the will specifically increasing the amount of a generation-skipping transfer under the will. All transfers made pursuant to the will or either of the trusts created thereunder are precluded from qualifying under the transition rule of paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section and are subject to tax under chapter 13. Example 5. Corrective action effective. Assume that T in Example 4 later executes a second codicil deleting the increase to the generation-skipping transfer. Because the provision increasing a generation-skipping transfer does not become effective, it is not considered an amendment to a will in existence on October 22, 1986. (B) Facts applicable to Examples 6 through 9. T created a trust on September 30, 1985, in which T retained the power to revoke the transfer at any time prior to T's death. The trust provided that, upon the death of T, the income was to be paid to T's spouse, W, for life and then to A, B, and C, the children of T's sibling, S, in equal shares for life, with one-third of the principal to be distributed per stirpes to each child's surviving issue upon the death of the child. The trustee has the power to make discretionary distributions of trust principal to T's sibling, S. Example 6. Amendment that affects only a person who is not a skip person. A became disabled, and T modified the trust on December 1, 1986, to increase A's share of the income. Since the amendment does not result in the creation of, or increase in the amount of, a generation-skipping transfer, transfers pursuant to the trust are not subject to chapter 13. Example 7. Amendment increasing skip person's share. Assume that A, B, and C are the grandchildren of S rather than the children (and thus are skip persons as defined in section 2613). T's amendment of the trust increasing A's share of the income subjects the trust to the provisions of chapter 13 because the amendment increases the amount of the generation-skipping transfers to be made to A. Example 8. Amendment that adds a skip person. Assume that T amends the trust to add T's grandchild, D, as an income beneficiary. The trust will be subject to the provisions of chapter 13 because the amendment creates a generation-skipping transfer. Example 9. Refund of tax paid during interim period when effect of amendment is not determinable. Assume that T amends the trust to provide that the issue of S are to take a one-fourth share of the principal per stirpes upon S's death. Because the distribution to be made upon S's death may involve skip persons, the amendment is considered an amendment that creates or increases the amount of a generation-skipping transfer until a determination can be made. Accordingly, any distributions from (or terminations of interests in) such trust are subject to chapter 13 until it is determined that no skip person has been added to the trust. At that time, a claim for refund may be filed within the period set forth in section 6511 with respect to any generation-skipping transfer tax that was paid. (3) Transition rule in the case of mental incompetency--(i) In general. If an individual was under a mental disability to change the disposition of his or her property continuously from October 22, 1986, until the date of his or her death, the provisions of chapter 13 do not apply to any generation-skipping transfer-- (A) Under a trust (as defined in section 2652(b)) to the extent such trust consists of property, or the proceeds of property, the value of which was included in the gross estate of the individual (other than property transferred by or on behalf of the individual during the individual's life after October 22, 1986); or (B) Which is a direct skip (other than a direct skip from a trust) that occurs by reason of the death of the individual. (ii) Mental disability defined. For purposes of this paragraph (b)(2), the term mental disability means mental incompetence to execute an instrument governing the disposition of the individual's property, whether or not there was an adjudication of incompetence and regardless of whether there has been an appointment of a guardian, fiduciary, or other person charged with either the care of the individual or the care of the individual's property. (iii)(A) Decedent who has not been adjudged mentally incompetent. If there has not been a court adjudication that the decedent was mentally incompetent on or before October 22, 1986, the executor must file, with Form 706, either-- (1) A certification from a qualified physician stating that the decedent was-- (i) mentally incompetent at all times on and after October 22, 1986; and (ii) did not regain competence to modify or revoke the terms of the trust or will prior to his or her death; or (2) Sufficient other evidence demonstrating that the decedent was mentally incompetent at all times on and after October 22, 1986, as well as a statement explaining why no certification is available from a physician; and (3) Any judgement or decree relating to the decedent's incompetency that was made after October 22, 1986. (B) Such items in paragraphs (b)(3)(iii)(A), (B), and (C) of this section will be considered relevant, but not determinative, in establishing the decedent's state of competency. (iv) Decedent who has been adjudged mentally incompetent. If the decedent has been adjudged mentally incompetent on or before October 22, 1986, a copy of the judgment or decree, and any modification thereof, must be filed with the Form 706. (v) Rule applies even if another person has power to change trust terms. In the case of a transfer from a trust, this paragraph (b)(3) applies even though a person charged with the care of the decedent or the decedent's property has the power to revoke or modify the terms of the trust, provided that the power is not exercised after October 22, 1986, in a manner that creates, or increases the amount of, a generation-skipping transfer. See paragraph (b)(2)(iv) of this section for rules concerning amendments that create or increase the amount of a generation-skipping transfer. (vi) Example. The following example illustrates the application of paragraph (b)(3)(v) of this section: Example. T was mentally incompetent on October 22, 1986, and remained so until death in 1993. Prior to becoming incompetent, T created a revocable generation-skipping trust that was includible in T's gross estate. Prior to October 22, 1986, the appropriate court issued an order under which P, who was thereby charged with the care of T's property, had the power to modify or revoke the revocable trust. Although P exercised the power after October 22, 1986, and while T was incompetent, the power was not exercised in a manner that created, or increased the amount of, a generation-skipping transfer. Thus, the existence and exercise of P's power did not cause the trust to lose its exempt status under paragraph (b)(3) of this section. The result would be the same if the court order was issued after October 22, 1986. (4) Exceptions to additions rule--(i) In general. Any addition to a trust made pursuant to an instrument or arrangement covered by the transition rules in paragraph (b)(1), (2) or (3) of this section is not treated as an addition for purposes of this section. Moreover, any property transferred inter vivos to a trust is not treated as an addition if the same property would have been added to the trust pursuant to an instrument covered by the transition rules in paragraph (b)(2) or (3) of this section. (ii) Examples. The following examples illustrate the application of paragraph (b)(4)(i) of this section: Example 1. Addition pursuant to terms of exempt instrument. On December 31, 1980, T created an irrevocable trust having a principal of $100,000. Under the terms of the trust, the principal was to be held for the benefit of T's grandchild, GC. Pursuant to the terms of T's will, a document entitled to relief under the transition rule of paragraph (b)(2) of this section, the residue of the estate was paid to the trust. Because the addition to the trust was paid pursuant to the terms of an instrument (T's will) that is not subject to the provisions of chapter 13 because of paragraph (b)(2) of this section, the payment to the trust is not considered an addition to the principal of the trust. Thus, distributions to or for the benefit of GC, are not subject to the provisions of chapter 13. Example 2. Property transferred inter vivos that would have been transferred to the same trust by the transferor's will. T is the grantor of a trust that was irrevocable on September 25, 1985. T's will, which was executed before October 22, 1986, and not amended thereafter, provides that, upon T's death, the entire estate will pour over into T's trust. On October 1, 1985, T transfers $100,000 to the trust. While T's will otherwise qualifies for relief under the transition rule in paragraph (b)(2) of this section, the transition rule is not applicable unless T dies prior to January 1, 1987. Thus, if T dies after December 31, 1986, the transfer is treated as an addition to the trust for purposes of any distribution made from the trust after the transfer to the trust on October 1, 1985. If T dies before January 1, 1987, the entire trust (as well as any distributions from or terminations of interests in the trust prior to T's death) is exempt, under paragraph (b)(2) of this section, from chapter 13 because the $100,000 would have been added to the trust under a will that would have qualified under paragraph (b)(2) of this section. In either case, for any generation- skipping transfers made after the transfer to the trust on October 1, 1985, but before T's death, the $100,000 is treated as an addition to the trust and a proportionate amount of the trust is subject to chapter 13. Example 3. Pour over to a revocable trust. T and S are the settlors of separate revocable trusts with equal values. Both trusts were established for the benefit of skip persons (as defined in section 2613). S dies on December 1, 1985, and under the provisions of S's trust, the principal pours over into T's trust. If T dies before January 1, 1987, the entire trust is excluded under paragraph (b)(2) of this section from the operation of chapter 13. If T dies after December 31, 1986, the entire trust is subject to the generation-skipping transfer tax provisions because T's trust is not a trust described in paragraph (b)(1) or (2) of this section. In the latter case, the fact that S died before January 1, 1987, is irrelevant because the principal of S's trust was added to a trust that never qualified under the transition rules of paragraph (b)(1) or (2) of this section. Example 4. Pour over to exempt trust. Assume the same facts as in Example 3, except upon the death of S on December 1, 1985, S's trust continues as an irrevocable trust and that the principal of T's trust is to be paid over upon T's death to S's trust. Again, if T dies before January 1, 1987, S's entire trust falls within the provisions of paragraph (b)(2) of this section. However, if T dies after December 31, 1986, the pour-over is considered an addition to the trust. Therefore, S's trust is not a trust excluded under paragraph (b)(2) of this section because an addition is made to the trust. Example 5. Lapse of a general power of appointment. S, the spouse of the settlor of an irrevocable trust that was created in 1980, had, on September 25, 1985, a general power of appointment over the trust assets. The trust provides that should S fail to exercise the power of appointment the property is to remain in the trust. On October 21, 1986, S executed a will under which S failed to exercise the power of appointment. If S dies before January 1, 1987, without having exercised the power in a manner which results in the creation of, or increase in the amount of, a generation-skipping transfer (or amended the will in a manner that results in the creation of, or increase in the amount of, a generation-skipping transfer), transfers pursuant to the trust or the will are not subject to chapter 13 because the trust is an irrevocable trust and the will qualifies under paragraph (b)(2) of this section. Example 6. Lapse of general power of appointment held by intestate decedent. Assume the same facts as in Example 5, except on October 22, 1986, S did not have a will and that S dies after that date. Upon S's death, or upon the prior exercise or release of the power, the value of the entire trust is treated as having been distributed to S, and S is treated as having made an addition to the trust in the amount of the entire principal. Any distribution or termination pursuant to the trust occurring after S's death is subject to chapter 13. It is immaterial whether S's death occurs before January 1, 1987, since paragraph (b)(2) of this section is only applicable where a will or revocable trust was executed before October 22, 1986. (c) Additional effective dates. Except as otherwise provided, the regulations under 26.2611-1, 26.2612-1, 26.2613-1, 26.2632-1, 26.2641-1, 26.2642-1, 26.2642-2, 26.2642-3, 26.2642-4, 26.2642-5, 26.2652-1, 26.2652-2, 26.2653-1, 26.2654-1, 26.2663-1, and 26.2663-2 are effective with respect to generation-skipping transfers as defined in 26.2611-1 made on or after December 27, 1995. However, taxpayers may, at their option, rely on these regulations in the case of generation-skipping transfers made, and trusts that became irrevocable, after December 23, 1992, and before December 27, 1995. 26.2611-1 Generation-skipping transfer defined. A generation-skipping transfer (GST) is an event that is either a direct skip, a taxable distribution, or a taxable termination. See 26.2612-1 for the definition of these terms. The determination as to whether an event is a GST is made by reference to the most recent transfer subject to the estate or gift tax. See 26.2652-1(a)(2) for determining whether a transfer is subject to Federal estate or gift tax. 26.2612-1 Definitions. (a) Direct skip--(1) In general. A direct skip is a transfer to a skip person that is subject to Federal estate or gift tax. If property is transferred to a trust, the transfer is a direct skip only if the trust is a skip person. Only one direct skip occurs when a single transfer of property skips two or more generations. See paragraph (d) of this section for the definition of skip person. See 26.2652-1(b) for the definition of trust. See 26.2632-1(c)(4) for the time that a direct skip occurs if the transferred property is subject to an estate tax inclusion period. (2) Special rule for certain lineal descendants--(i) In general. Solely for the purpose of determining whether a transfer to or for the benefit of a lineal descendant of the transferor, the transferor's spouse, or a former spouse of the transferor is a direct skip, the generation assignment of the descendant is determined by disregarding the generation of a predeceased individual who was both an ancestor of the descendant and a lineal descendant of the transferor, the transferor's spouse, or a former spouse of the transferor (a predeceased child). If a transfer to a trust would be a direct skip but for this paragraph, any generation assignment determined under this paragraph continues to apply in determining whether any subsequent distribution from (or termination of an interest in) the portion of the trust attributable to that transfer is a GST. A living descendant who dies no later than 90 days after the subject transfer is treated as having predeceased the transferor to the extent that either the governing instrument or applicable local law provides that such individual shall be treated as predeceasing the transferor. Except as provided in this paragraph (a)(2), a living descendant is not treated as a predeceased child solely by reason of applicable local law; e.g., an individual is not treated as a predeceased child solely because state law treats an individual executing a disclaimer as having predeceased the transferor of the disclaimed property. See 26.2652-1(a)(1) for the definition of transferor. See paragraph (e) of this section for the definition of interest in trust. (ii) Special rule. If a transferor makes an addition to an existing trust after the death of an individual described in paragraph (a)(2)(i) of this section (so that the lineal descendant would be assigned to a highter generation by reason of that death), the additional property is treated as being held in a separate trust for purposes of chapter 13 and the provisions of 26.2654-1(a)(2) apply as if the portions of the single trust had separate transferors. Subsequent additions are treated as additions to the appropriate portion of the single trust. (b) Taxable termination--(1) In general. Except as otherwise provided in this paragraph (b), a taxable termination is a termination (occurring for any reason) of an interest in trust unless-- (i) A transfer subject to Federal estate or gift tax occurs with respect to the property held in the trust at the time of the termination; (ii) Immediately after the termination, a person who is not a skip person has an interest in the trust; or (iii) At no time after the termination may a distribution, other than a distribution the probability of which occurring is so remote as to be negligible (including a distribution at the termination of the trust) be made from the trust to a skip person. For this purpose, the probability that a distribution will occur is so remote as to be negligible only if it can be ascertained by actuarial standards that there is less than a 5 percent probability that the distribution will occur. (2) Partial termination. If a distribution of a portion of trust property is made to a skip person by reason of a termination occurring on the death of a lineal descendant of the transferor, the termination is a taxable termination with respect to the distributed property. (3) Simultaneous terminations. A simultaneous termination of two or more interests creates only one taxable termination. (c) Taxable distribution--(1) In general. A taxable distribution is a distribution of income or principal from a trust to a skip person unless the distribution is a taxable termination or a direct skip. If any portion of GST tax (including penalties and interest thereon) imposed on a distributee is paid from the distributing trust, the payment is an additional taxable distribution to the distributee. For purposes of chapter 13, the additional distribution is treated as having been made on the last day of the calendar year in which the original taxable distribution is made. If Federal estate or gift tax is imposed on any individual with respect to an interest in property held by a trust, the interest in property is treated as having been distributed to the individual to the extent that the value of the interest is subject to Federal estate or gift tax. See 26.2652-1(a)(6) Example 5, regarding the treatment of the lapse of a power of appointment as a transfer to a trust. (2) Look-through rule not to apply. Solely for purposes of determining whether any transfer from a trust to another trust is a taxable distribution, the rules of section 2651(e)(2) do not apply. If the transferring trust and the recipient trust have the same transferor, see 26.2642-4(a)(1) and (2) for rules for recomputing the applicable fraction of the recipient trust. (d) Skip person. A skip person is-- (1) An individual assigned to a generation more than one generation below that of the transferor (determined under the rules of section 2651); or (2) A trust if-- (i) All interests in the trust are held by skip persons; or (ii) No person holds an interest in the trust and no distributions, other than a distribution the probability of which occurring is so remote as to be negligible (including distributions at the termination of the trust), may be made after the transfer to a person other than a skip person. For this purpose, the probability that a distribution will occur is so remote as to be negligible only if it can be ascertained by actuarial standards that there is less than a 5 percent probability that the distribution will occur. (e) Interest in trust--(1) In general. An interest in trust is an interest in property held in trust as defined in section 2652(c) and these regulations. An interest in trust exists if a person-- (i) Has a present right to receive trust principal or income; (ii) Is a permissible current recipient of trust principal or income and is not described in section 2055(a); or (iii) Is described in section 2055(a) and the trust is a charitable remainder annuity trust or unitrust (as defined in section 664(d)) or a pooled income fund (as defined in section 642(c)(5)). (2) Exceptions--(i) Support obligations. In general, an individual has a present right to receive trust income or principal if trust income or principal may be used to satisfy the individual's support obligations. However, an individual does not have an interest in a trust merely because a support obligation of that individual may be satisfied by a distribution that is either within the discretion of a fiduciary or pursuant to provisions of local law substantially equivalent to the Uniform Gifts (Transfers) to Minors Act. (ii) Certain interests disregarded. An interest which is used primarily to postpone or avoid the GST tax is disregarded for purposes of chapter 13. An interest is considered as used primarily to postpone or avoid the GST tax if a significant purpose for the creation of the interest is to postpone or avoid the tax. (3) Disclaimers. An interest does not exist to the extent it is disclaimed pursuant to a disclaimer that constitutes a qualified disclaimer under section 2518. (f) Examples. The following examples illustrate the provisions of this section. Unless stated otherwise, paragraph (a)(2) of this section, which assigns descendants to a higher generation when there is a predeceased ancestor, does not apply. Example 1. Direct skip. T gratuitously conveys Blackacre to T's grandchild. Because the transfer is a transfer to a skip person of property subject to Federal gift tax, it is a direct skip. Example 2. Direct skip of more than one generation. T gratuitously conveys Blackacre to T's great-grandchild. The transfer is a direct skip. Only one GST tax is imposed on the direct skip although two generations are skipped by the transfer. Example 3. Withdrawal power in trust. T transfers $50,000 to a new trust providing that trust income is to be paid to T's child, C, for life and, on C's death, the trust principal is to be paid to T's descendants. Under the terms of the trust, T grants four grandchildren the right to withdraw $10,000 from the trust for a 60 day period following the transfer. Since C, who is not a skip person, has an interest in the trust, the trust is not a skip person. T's transfer to the trust is not a direct skip. Example 4. Taxable termination. T establishes an irrevocable trust under which the income is to be paid to T's child, C, for life. On the death of C, the trust principal is to be paid to T's grandchild, GC. Since C has an interest in the trust, the trust is not a skip person and the transfer to the trust is not a direct skip. If C dies survived by GC, a taxable termination occurs at C's death because C's interest in the trust terminates and thereafter the trust property is held by a skip person who occupies a lower generation than C. Example 5. Direct skip of property held in trust. T establishes a testamentary trust under which the income is to be paid to T's surviving spouse, S, for life and the remainder is to be paid to a grandchild of T and S. T's executor elects to treat the trust as qualified terminable interest property under section 2056(b)(7). The transfer to the trust is not a direct skip because S, a person who is not a skip person, holds a present right to receive income from the trust. Upon S's death, the trust property is included in S's gross estate under section 2044 and passes directly to a skip person. The GST occurring at that time is a direct skip because it is a transfer subject to chapter 11. The fact that the interest created by T is terminated at S's death is immaterial because S becomes the transferor at the time of the transfer subject to chapter 11. Example 6. Predeceased ancestor exception. T establishes an irrevocable trust providing that trust income is to be paid to T's grandchild, GC, for 5 years. At the end of the 5-year period, the trust is to terminate and the principal is to be distributed to GC. T's child, C, a parent of GC, is deceased at the time T establishes the trust. Therefore, GC is treated as a child of T rather than as a grandchild. As a result, GC is not a skip person, and the initial transfer to the trust is not a direct skip. Similarly, distributions to GC during the term of the trust and at the termination of the trust will not be GSTs. Example 7. Predeceased ancestor exception not applicable. The facts are the same as in Example 6, except the trust income is to be paid to T's spouse, S, during the first two years of the trust. Since S has an interest in the trust, the trust is not a skip person and the transfer by T is not a direct skip. Since the transfer is not a direct skip, the predeceased ancestor rule does not apply and GC is not treated as the child of T. A taxable termination occurs at the expiration of S's interest. Example 8. Taxable termination. T establishes an irrevocable trust for the benefit of T's child, C, T's grandchild, GC, and T's great-grandchild, GGC. Under the terms of the trust, income and principal may be distributed to any or all of the living beneficiaries at the discretion of the trustee. Upon the death of the second beneficiary to die, the trust principal is to be paid to the survivor. C dies first. A taxable termination occurs at that time because, immediately after C's interest terminates, all interests in the trust are held by skip persons (GC and GGC). Example 9. Taxable termination resulting from distribution. The facts are the same as in Example 8, except twenty years after C's death the trustee exercises its discretionary power and distributes the entire principal to GGC. The distribution results in a taxable termination because GC's interest in the trust terminates as a result of the distribution of the entire trust property to GGC, a skip person. The result would be the same if the trustee retained sufficient funds to pay the GST tax due by reason of the taxable termination, as well as any expenses of winding up the trust. Example 10. Simultaneous termination of interests of more than one beneficiary. T establishes an irrevocable trust for the benefit of T's child, C, T's grandchild, GC, and T's great- grandchild, GGC. Under the terms of the trust, income and principal may be distributed to any or all of the living beneficiaries at the discretion of the trustee. Upon the death of C, the trust property is to be distributed to GGC if then living. If C is survived by both GC and GGC, both C's and GC's interests in the trust will terminate on C's death. However, because both interests will terminate at the same time and as a result of one event, only one taxable termination occurs. Example 11. Partial taxable termination. T creates an irrevocable trust providing that trust income is to be paid to T's children, A and B, in such proportions as the trustee determines for their joint lives. On the death of the first child to die, one-half of the trust principal is to be paid to T's then living grandchildren. The balance of the trust principal is to be paid to T's grandchildren on the death of the survivor of A and B. If A predeceases B, the distribution occurring on the termination of A's interest in the trust is a taxable termination and not a taxable distribution. It is a taxable termination because the distribution is a distribution of a portion of the trust that occurs as a result of the death of A, a lineal descendant of T. It is immaterial that a portion of the trust continues and that B, a person other than a skip person, thereafter holds an interest in the trust. Example 12. Taxable distribution. T establishes an irrevocable trust under which the trust income is payable to T's child, C, for life. When T's grandchild, GC, attains 35 years of age, GC is to receive one-half of the principal. The remaining one-half of the principal is to be distributed to GC on C's death. Assume that C survives until GC attains age 35. When the trustee distributes one-half of the principal to GC on GC's 35th birthday, the distribution is a taxable distribution because it is a distribution to a skip person and is neither a taxable termination nor a direct skip. Example 13. Exercise of withdrawal right as taxable distribution. The facts are the same as in Example 12, except GC holds a continuing right to withdraw trust principal and after one year GC withdraws $10,000. The withdrawal by GC is not a taxable termination because the withdrawal does not terminate C's interest in the trust. The withdrawal by GC is a taxable distribution to GC. Example 14. Interest in trust. T establishes an irrevocable trust under which the income is to be paid to T's child, C, for life. On the death of C, the trust principal is to be paid to T's grandchild, GC. Because C has a present right to receive income from the trust, C has an interest in the trust. Because GC cannot currently receive distributions from the trust, GC does not have an interest in the trust. Example 15. Support obligation. T establishes an irrevocable trust for the benefit of T's grandchild, GC. The trustee has discretion to distribute property for GC's support without regard to the duty or ability of GC's parent, C, to support GC. Because GC is a permissible current recipient of trust property, GC has an interest in the trust. C does not have an interest in the trust because the potential use of the trust property to satisfy C's support obligation is within the discretion of a fiduciary. C would be treated as having an interest in the trust if the trustee was required to distribute trust property for GC's support. 26.2613-1 Skip person. For the definition of skip person see 26.2612-1(d). 26.2632-1 Allocation of GST exemption. (a) General rule. Except as otherwise provided in this section, an individual or the individual's executor may allocate the individual's $1 million GST exemption at any time from the date of the transfer through the date for filing the individual's Federal estate tax return (including any extensions for filing that have been actually granted). If no estate tax return is required to be filed, the GST exemption may be allocated at any time through the date a Federal estate tax return would be due if a return were required to be filed (including any extensions actually granted). If property is held in trust, the allocation of GST exemption is made to the entire trust rather than to specific trust assets. If a transfer is a direct skip to a trust, the allocation of GST exemption to the transferred property is also treated as an allocation of GST exemption to the trust for purposes of future GSTs with respect to the trust by the same transferor. (b) Lifetime allocations--(1) Automatic allocation to direct skips--(i) In general. If a direct skip occurs during the transferor's lifetime, the transferor's GST exemption not previously allocated (unused GST exemption) is automatically allocated to the transferred property (but not in excess of the fair market value of the property on the date of the transfer). The transferor may prevent the automatic allocation of GST exemption by describing on a timely-filed United States Gift (and Generation-Skipping Transfer) Tax Return (Form 709) the transfer and the extent to which the automatic allocation is not to apply. In addition, a timely-filed Form 709 accompanied by payment of the GST tax (as shown on the return with respect to the direct skip) is sufficient to prevent an automatic allocation of GST exemption with respect to the transferred property. See paragraph (c)(4) of this section for special rules in the case of direct skips treated as occurring at the termination of an estate tax inclusion period. (ii) Time for filing Form 709. A Form 709 is timely filed if it is filed on or before the date required for reporting the transfer if it were a taxable gift (i.e., the date prescribed by section 6075(b), including any extensions to file actually granted (the due date)). Except as provided in paragraph (b)(1)(iii) of this section, the automatic allocation of GST exemption (or the election to prevent the allocation, if made) is irrevocable after the due date. An automatic allocation of GST exemption is effective as of the date of the transfer to which it relates. Except as provided above, a Form 709 need not be filed to report an automatic allocation. (iii) Transitional rule. An election to prevent an automatic allocation of GST exemption filed on or before January 26, 1996, becomes irrevocable on July 24, 1996. (2) Allocation to other transfers--(i) In general. An allocation of GST exemption to property transferred during the transferor's lifetime, other than in a direct skip, is made on Form 709. The allocation must clearly identify the trust to which the allocation is being made, the amount of GST exemption allocated to it, and if the allocation is late or if an inclusion ratio greater than zero is claimed, the value of the trust assets at the effective date of the allocation. See paragraph (b)(2)(ii) of this section. The allocation should also state the inclusion ratio of the trust after the allocation. Except as otherwise provided in this paragraph, an allocation of GST exemption may be made by a formula; e.g., the allocation may be expressed in terms of the amount necessary to produce an inclusion ratio of zero. However, formula allocations made with respect to charitable lead annuity trusts are not valid except to the extent they are dependent on values as finally determined for Federal estate or gift tax purposes. With respect to a timely allocation, an allocation of GST exemption becomes irrevocable after the due date of the return. Except as provided in 26.2642-3 (relating to charitable lead annuity trusts), an allocation of GST exemption to a trust is void to the extent the amount allocated exceeds the amount necessary to obtain an inclusion ratio of zero with respect to the trust. See 26.2642-1 for the definition of inclusion ratio. An allocation is also void if the allocation is made with respect to a trust that has no GST potential with respect to the transferor making the allocation, at the time of the allocation. For this purpose, a trust has GST potential even if the possibility of a GST is so remote as to be negligible. (ii) Effective date of allocation--(A) In general. (1) Except as otherwise provided, an allocation of GST exemption is effective as of the date of any transfer as to which the Form 709 on which it is made is a timely filed return (a timely allocation). If more than one timely allocation is made, the earlier allocation is modified only if the later allocation clearly identifies the transfer and the nature and extent of the modification. Except as provided in paragraph (d)(1) of this section, an allocation to a trust made on a Form 709 filed after the due date for reporting a transfer to the trust (a late allocation) is effective on the date the Form 709 is filed and is deemed to precede in point of time any taxable event occurring on such date. For purposes of this paragraph (b)(2)(ii), the Form 709 is deemed filed on the date it is postmarked to the Internal Revenue Service Center. See 26.2642-2 regarding the effect of a late allocation in determining the inclusion ratio, etc. See paragraph (c)(1) of this section regarding allocation of GST exemption to property subject to an estate tax inclusion period. If it is unclear whether an allocation of GST exemption on a Form 709 is a late or a timely allocation to a trust, the allocation is effective in the following order-- (i) To any transfer to the trust disclosed on the return as to which the return is a timely return; (ii) As a late allocation; and (iii) To any transfer to the trust not disclosed on the return as to which the return would be a timely return. (2) A late allocation to a trust may be made on a Form 709 that is timely filed with respect to another transfer. A late allocation is irrevocable when made. (B) Amount of allocation. If other transfers exist with respect to which GST exemption could be allocated under paragraphs (b)(2)(ii)(A)(1)(ii) and (iii), any GST exemption allocated under paragraph (b)(2)(ii)(A)(1)(i) of this section is allocated in an amount equal to the value of the transferred property as reported on the Form 709. Thus, if the GST exemption allocated on the Form 709 exceeds the value of the transfers reported on that return that have generation-skipping potential, the initial allocation under paragraph (b)(2)(ii)(A)(1)(i) of this section is in the amount of the value of those transfers as reported on that return. Any remaining amount of GST exemption allocated on that return is then allocated pursuant to paragraphs (b)(2)(ii)(A)(1)(ii) and (iii) of this section, notwithstanding any subsequent upward adjustment in value of the transfers reported on the return. (iii) Examples. The following examples illustrate the provisions of this paragraph (b): Example 1. Modification of allocation of GST exemption. T transfers $100,000 to an irrevocable generation-skipping trust on December 1, 1996. The transfer to the trust is not a direct skip. The date prescribed for filing the gift tax return reporting the taxable gift is April 15, 1997. On February 10, 1997, T files a Form 709 allocating $50,000 of GST exemption to the trust. On April 10 of the same year, T files an amended Form 709 allocating $100,000 of GST exemption to the trust in a manner that clearly indicates the intention to modify and supersede the prior allocation with respect to the 1996 transfer. The allocation made on the April 10 return supersedes the prior allocation because it is made on a timely-filed Form 709 that clearly identifies the trust and the nature and extent of the modification of GST exemption allocation. The allocation of $100,000 of GST exemption to the trust is effective as of December 1, 1996. The result would be the same if the amended Form 709 decreased the amount of the GST exemption allocated to the trust. Example 2. Modification of allocation of GST exemption. The facts are the same as in Example 1, except on July 10, 1997, T files a Form 709 attempting to reduce the earlier allocation. The return is not a timely-filed return. The $100,000 GST exemption allocated to the trust, as amended on April 10, 1997, remains in effect because an allocation, once made, is irrevocable and may not be modified after the last date on which a timely-filed Form 709 can be filed. Example 3. Effective date of late allocation of GST exemption. T transfers $100,000 to an irrevocable generation- skipping trust on December 1, 1996. The transfer to the trust is not a direct skip. The date prescribed for filing the gift tax return reporting the taxable gift is April 15, 1997. On December 1, 1997, T files a Form 709 and allocates $50,000 to the trust. The allocation is effective as of December 1, 1997. Example 4. Effective date of late allocation of GST exemption. T transfers $100,000 to a generation-skipping trust on December 1, 1996, in a transfer that is not a direct skip. T does not make an allocation of GST exemption on a timely-filed Form 709. On July 1, 1997, the trustee makes a taxable distribution from the trust to T's grandchild in the amount of $30,000. Immediately prior to the distribution, the value of the trust assets was $150,000. On the same date, T allocates GST exemption to the trust in the amount of $50,000. The allocation of GST exemption on the date of the transfer is treated as preceding in point of time the taxable distribution. At the time of the GST, the trust has an inclusion ratio of .6667 (1 - (50,000/150,000)). Example 5. Automatic allocation to split-gift direct skip. On May 15, 1996, T transfers $50,000 to a trust in a direct skip. T does not file a timely gift tax return electing out of the automatic allocation. On April 30, 1998, T and T's spouse, S, file an initial gift tax return for 1996 on which they consent, pursuant to section 2513, to have the gift treated as if one-half had been made by each. As a result of the election under section 2513, which is retroactive to the date of T's transfer, T and S are each treated as the transferor of one-half of the property transferred in the direct skip. Thus, $25,000 of T's unused GST exemption and $25,000 of S's unused GST exemption is automatically allocated to the trust. Both allocations are effective on and after the date that T made the transfer. (c) Special rules during an estate tax inclusion period--(1) In general. An allocation of GST exemption (including an automatic allocation) to property subject to an estate tax inclusion period (ETIP) that is made prior to termination of the ETIP cannot be revoked, but becomes effective no earlier than the date of any termination of the ETIP with respect to the trust. Where an allocation has not been made prior to the termination of the ETIP, an allocation is effective at the termination of the ETIP during the transferor's lifetime if made by the due date for filing a Form 709 that would apply to a taxable gift occurring at the time the ETIP terminates (timely ETIP return). An allocation is effective in the case of the termination of the ETIP on the death of the transferor as provided in paragraph (d) of this section. If any part of a trust is subject to an ETIP, the entire trust is subject to the ETIP. See 26.2642-1(b)(2) for rules determining the inclusion ratio applicable in the case of GSTs during an ETIP. (2) Estate tax inclusion period defined--(i) In general. An ETIP is the period during which, should death occur, the value of transferred property would be includible (other than by reason of section 2035) in the gross estate of-- (A) The transferor; or (B) The spouse of the transferor. (ii) Exceptions--(A) For purposes of paragraph (c)(2) of this section, the value of transferred property is not considered as being subject to inclusion in the gross estate of the transferor or the spouse of the transferor if the possibility that the property will be included is so remote as to be negligible. A possibility is so remote as to be negligible if it can be ascertained by actuarial standards that there is less than a 5 percent probability that the property will be included in the gross estate. (B) For purposes of paragraph (c)(2) of this section, the value of transferred property is not considered as being subject to inclusion in the gross estate of the spouse of the transferor, if the spouse possesses with respect to any transfer to the trust, a right to withdraw no more than the greater of $5,000 or 5 percent of the trust corpus, and such withdrawal right terminates no later than 60 days after the transfer to the trust. (C) The rules of this paragraph (c)(2) do not apply to qualified terminable interest property with respect to which the special election under 26.2652-2 has been made. (3) Termination of an ETIP. An ETIP terminates on the first to occur of-- (i) The death of the transferor; (ii) The time at which no portion of the property is includible in the transferor's gross estate (other than by reason of section 2035) or, in the case of an individual who is a transferor solely by reason of an election under section 2513, the time at which no portion would be includible in the gross estate of the individual's spouse (other than by reason of section 2035); (iii) The time of a GST, but only with respect to the property involved in the GST; or (iv) In the case of an ETIP arising by reason of an interest or power held by the transferor's spouse under subsection (c)(2)(i)(B) of this section, at the first to occur of-- (A) The death of the spouse; or (B) The time at which no portion of the property would be includible in the spouse's gross estate (other than by reason of section 2035). (4) Treatment of direct skips. If property transferred to a skip person is subject to an ETIP, the direct skip is treated as occurring on the termination of the ETIP. (5) Examples. The following examples illustrate the rules of this section as they apply to the termination of an ETIP during the lifetime of the transferor. In each example assume that T transfers $100,000 to an irrevocable trust: Example 1. Allocation of GST exemption during ETIP. The trust instrument provides that trust income is to be paid to T for 9 years or until T's prior death. The trust principal is to be paid to T's grandchild on the termination of T's income interest. If T dies within the 9-year period, the value of the trust principal is includible in T's gross estate under section 2036(a). Thus, the trust is subject to an ETIP. T files a timely Form 709 reporting the transfer and allocating $100,000 of GST exemption to the trust. The allocation of GST exemption to the trust is not effective until the termination of the ETIP. Example 2. Effect of prior allocation on termination of ETIP. The facts are the same as in Example 1, except the trustee has the power to invade trust principal on behalf of T's grandchild, GC, during the term of T's income interest. In year 4, when the value of the trust is $200,000, the trustee distributes $15,000 to GC. The distribution is a taxable distribution. The ETIP with respect to the property distributed to GC terminates at the time of the taxable distribution. See paragraph (c)(3)(iii) of this section. Solely for purposes of determining the trust's inclusion ratio with respect to the taxable distribution, the prior $100,000 allocation of GST exemption (as well as any additional allocation made on a timely ETIP return) is effective immediately prior to the taxable distribution. See 26.2642- 1(b)(2). The trust's inclusion ratio with respect to the taxable distribution is therefore .50 (1-(100,000/200,000)). Example 3. Split-gift transfers subject to ETIP. The trust instrument provides that trust income is to be paid to T for 9 years or until T's prior death. The trust principal is to be paid to T's grandchild on the termination of T's income interest. T files a timely Form 709 reporting the transfer. T's spouse, S, consents to have the gift treated as made one-half by S under section 2513. Because S is treated as transferring one-half of the property to T's grandchild, S becomes the transferor of one- half of the trust for purposes of chapter 13. Because the value of the trust would be includible in T's gross estate if T died immediately after the transfer, S's transfer is subject to an ETIP. If S should die prior to the termination of the trust, S's executor may allocate S's GST exemption to the trust, but only to the portion of the trust for which S is treated as the transferor. However, the allocation does not become effective until the earlier of the expiration of T's income interest or T's death. Example 4. Transfer of retained interest as ETIP termination. The trust instrument provides that trust income is to be paid to T for 9 years or until T's prior death. The trust principal is to be paid to T's grandchild on the termination of T's income interest. Four years after the initial transfer, T transfers the income interest to T's sibling. The ETIP with respect to the trust terminates on T's transfer of the income interest because, after the transfer, the trust property would not be includible in T's gross estate (other than by reason of section 2035) if T died at that time. (d) Allocations after the transferor's death--(1) Allocation by executor. Except as otherwise provided in this paragraph (d), an allocation of a decedent's unused GST exemption by the executor of the decedent's estate is made on the appropriate United States Estate (and Generation-Skipping Transfer) Tax Return (Form 706 or Form 706NA) filed on or before the date prescribed for filing the return by section 6075(a) (including any extensions actually granted (the due date)). An allocation of GST exemption with respect to pro