Volume 12 Issue 4 |
 |
July/Aug 2000 |
ISOs Versus Non-Statutory Stock Options? (Part II)
© by Tax & Business Professionals
In the last issue (click here), we looked at
so-called Non-Statutory or Non-Qualified Stock Options (NSSOs).
This time, we will look at Incentive Stock Options, usually referred to
as ISOs. Next time, we will look at a number of planning issues relating
to stock options.
ISO plans have two potentially important tax advantages to employees. First,
the exercise of the ISO option usually does not trigger any recognition of
income or gain, even if the stock is unrestricted.
Second, if the stock is held until at least one year after the date of
exercise (or two years from the date the option is granted, whichever is later),
all of the gain on the sale of the stock, when recognized for income tax
purposes, will be capital gain, rather than ordinary income. If the ISO stock is
sold prior to the expiration of that holding period, then the income is ordinary
income.
For example, suppose that Zed, an employee of BigDeal.com, is granted the
option to purchase BigDeal.com stock at a price of $45 per share. One year
later, when BigDeal.com stock is trading at $100 a share, Zed exercises his
option and then holds the stock for two years, at which point he sells it at
$200 a share.
Under the ISO rules, the exercise of the option would not be subject to tax
as compensation income, and all $155 per share of gain would be capital gain
when he sold the stock.
As is true with many tax "benefits," these come at a price. In this
instance, the price is exacted by the dreaded Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT).
While the exercise of an ISO does not cause any taxable event under the
regular tax system, it does have consequences under the AMT system. Under the
AMT rules, the difference between the fair market value of the stock and the
option exercise price will be treated as taxable income when the employee’s
rights to the stock become fully vested and no longer subject to a risk of
forfeiture. This "spread" is treated as an AMT adjustment.
In Zed’s case, while the exercise of the option would not trigger
recognition of regular income tax, it would result in the creation of an AMT
adjustment in the amount of $55 per share. The effect of this AMT adjustment can
be to require Zed to recognize AMT taxable income, and perhaps pay AMT tax, on
his exercise of the option, even though the stock might be held for many years
or ultimately sold at a loss.
Also, the basis in the stock, for AMT purposes only, becomes in effect the
fair market value as of the date that the AMT adjustment arises. In theory,
because of this basis adjustment, when the stock is actually sold, there will be
no AMT gain to the extent of the "spread" that was previously subject
to AMT tax.
Because the basis in the stock for regular tax purposes will not include the
"spread" that was previously included in the AMT taxable income, there
is a risk of double taxation.
In theory, the payment of AMT in the year of exercise creates a credit which
then reduces the regular tax in the year the stock is actually sold, since in
that year, disregarding all other factors, the regular taxable income would be
larger than the AMT taxable income, owing to the differences in the stock basis.
This is, at least, the theory, in greatly simplified form. In practice,
however, the extent to which there will be a significant risk of double taxation
depends upon the rather complicated calculation and operation of the AMT credit.
While the rules for the two different types of stock options differ, both
ISOs and non-qualified options afford employees the opportunity to convert what
would otherwise be ordinary, compensation income into capital gain. Given the
current capital gain rates, that advantage can be significant. Taking full
advantage of this benefit, however, can require careful planning at the time of
both the exercise and the subsequent sale of the stock, and this is particularly
true with planning for the AMT consequences of ISO stock. Next time, we will
consider a few of the more common planning problems. For a more detailed
analysis of stock options, click here.
Previous Article | Next Article
List of Articles by Tax & Business Professionals
Published jointly by The Tax & Business Professionals, Inc. and the law firm of Newland & Associates as a service to their clients.
If you are a tax professional and would like more information about the subjects covered in this newsletter or any other tax and business matter, please call the Tax & Business Professionals, Inc. at (800)-553-6613, e-mail us at
, or visit our web site at http://www.tax-business.com.
For a full range of business law and tax-related services, call the law firm of Newland & Associates at (703) 330-0000.
If you are reading this newsletter but are not on our mailing list, and would like to be, please contact us at (800) 553-6613.
While designed to be accurate, this publication is not intended to constitute the rendering of legal, accounting, or other professional services or to serve as a substitute for such services.
Redistribution or other commercial use of the material contained in Tax & Business Insights is expressly prohibited without the written permission of Tax and Business Professionals, Inc.
SEARCH:
You can search for information in the entire Authors Row section,
or in the entire site. For a more focused search, put your search word(s) in quotes.
Tax & Business Professionals Main | Authors Row Main | Home
|