Volume 13 Issue 4 |
 |
July/Aug 2001 |
More IRA Options -- New IRS Rules
© by Tax & Business Professionals
The IRS has justifiably received much praise for the new
regulations on IRA distributions that were released earlier this year. While
billed as "simpler" than the previous rules, the new rules aren’t exactly
light reading.
Nevertheless, there are a few key aspects of the new rules
that every practitioner should know.
The proposed new rules significantly alter, among other
components of the IRA regime:
1. the rules
for computing the minimum required distributions
(RMDs) from the IRA;
2. the rules
relating to the designation of beneficiaries;
3. the rules
governing the consequences of beneficiary designation on the minimum
distribution requirements.
Beginning with distributions for 2001, the distribution
requirements are keyed to a uniform life expectancy table rather than to the
individual life expectancies of the IRA owner or beneficiary. In most cases, the use of the uniform table will reduce the minimum
distribution requirement for most owners and beneficiaries.
Happily, it will no longer be necessary to deal with the
question of recalculating life expectancies each year. The uniform table makes
recalculation unnecessary.
For example, suppose an IRA owner under the old rules had
an IRA worth $100,000 on December 31, 1999, and had no designated beneficiary as
of the Required Beginning Date (RBD). For the first year of distributions, when
the owner was 71, the RMD would have been $6,536 ($100,000 divided by a life
expectancy of 15.3. Under the new
rules, the minimum distribution in year 2001, assuming the same account value,
would be $3,953 ($100,000 divided by 25.3, the "life expectancy" value under
the uniform table). Under the new
rules, it makes no difference whether a beneficiary had been designated.
There is one significant exception to the uniform,
simplified approach to computing required distributions. If the IRA owner’s spouse is more than 10 years younger than the IRA
owner and is the sole beneficiary of the IRA, the required distribution may be
computed using the actual joint life expectancy of the IRA owner and the spouse,
usually resulting in lower minimum distributions than even the uniform table.
From a planning perspective, one of the most significant
effects of the new proposed rules is the change in the time at which the
designated beneficiary is determined. Under
the newly proposed rules, the designated beneficiary is determined as of the end
of the year following the death of the IRA owner. Therefore beneficiary
designations can be changed up to the date of death.
Importantly, for IRA owners over age 70½ who failed to
designate a beneficiary prior to reaching age 70½, they now have a chance to
correct that oversight. Moreover,
certain post-death events, such as disclaimers, will now be taken into account
in determining the designated beneficiary.
In a nutshell, the new distribution rules, subject to
various exceptions and qualifications, are:
Distributions must begin as of the RBD (as under the old
rules), but the RMD is determined based on the IRA owner’s life expectancy
under a uniform table.
If the IRA owner dies and there is a designated
beneficiary (as of the end of the year after death), distributions must occur
over the life expectancy of the beneficiary.
If the IRA owner dies without a designated beneficiary,
the required distributions depend upon whether death occurs before or after
the RBD. If death occurs before
the RBD, the IRA must be distributed within 5 years.
If the death occurs after the RBD, distributions must take place over
the remaining life expectancy of the IRA owner immediately before his or her
death.
While keeping some of the provisions of the old rules on
the rights of a surviving spouse to treat the IRA as his or her own, the new
rules do make several important clarifications and modifications. Under the new
rules, it now appears that if a trust is a beneficiary, even if the surviving
spouse is the sole beneficiary of that trust, this may prevent the spouse from
making this election.
For a much more detailed discussion of the new rules and
the planning possibilities under them, Click Here, or
give us a call.
Previous Article | Next Article
List of Articles by Tax & Business Professionals
Published jointly by The Tax & Business Professionals, Inc. and the law firm of Newland & Associates as a service to their clients.
If you are a tax professional and would like more information about the subjects covered in this newsletter or any other tax and business matter, please call the Tax & Business Professionals, Inc. at (800)-553-6613, e-mail us at
, or visit our web site at http://www.tax-business.com.
For a full range of business law and tax-related services, call the law firm of Newland & Associates at (703) 330-0000.
If you are reading this newsletter but are not on our mailing list, and would like to be, please contact us at (800) 553-6613.
While designed to be accurate, this publication is not intended to constitute the rendering of legal, accounting, or other professional services or to serve as a substitute for such services.
Redistribution or other commercial use of the material contained in Tax & Business Insights is expressly prohibited without the written permission of Tax and Business Professionals, Inc.
SEARCH:
You can search for information in the entire Authors Row section,
or in the entire site. For a more focused search, put your search word(s) in quotes.
Tax & Business Professionals Main | Authors Row Main | Home
|