Home >
Audit Proofing Stratagies > Tax Scams and Shams
Step 4-1
Tax Scams and Shams
In the last few years taxpayers have been bombarded by promotions
of various shady schemes and tactics that challenge the power structure
of the government. Even though some are alleged to be tax-avoidance maneuvers,
they are really tax-evasion acts that could result in the imposition of
heavy civil and criminal penalties.
There are now so many of these patently illegal schemes that the
IRS has grouped them into the category of tax-protester activity, even
though some schemes are purported to be "tax shelters." The IRS
defines a tax protester as, "a person who employees one or more illegal
schemes that offset the payment of taxes."
These protesters attempt to undermine the tax system by using various
schemes that lead to the evasion of taxes. The "illegal tax-protest
movement" is a general term describing several areas of noncompliance
in which a growing number of individuals and groups are using illegal methods
to protest the tax laws.
The illegal tax-protest movement began in the early 1920s. Until
a few years ago, the movement was centered mainly in the western and southwestern
parts of the country, and was viewed by IRS as a local compliance problem.
The movement consisted of a few individuals who disputed the constitutionality
of taxes and who practiced and promoted illegal schemes. The schemes were
simple and straightforward- individuals refused to file tax returns, or
would file returns but report no income.
The movement grew in the late 1960s, when protest returns were filed
by individuals who belonged to geographically isolated groups who protested:
(1) the Government's right to tax individual income, (2) the taxability
of paper money versus gold or silver, and/or (3) the unwarranted growth
of Government. Their protest scheme involved filing blank form 1040 tax
returns while citing the Fifth Amendment or monetary arguments. These arguments
have long been denied by the courts.
In recent years, the movement has continued to grow and spread across
the country as protesters make speeches and offer seminars, often misrepresenting
the tax laws. According to the IRS, the movement became more attractive
as our Nation's economic conditions worsened. Today people from all walks
of life are involved, and the schemes are more sophisticated.
As of September 30, 1986 the IRS had 22,211 protest-type tax returns
under examination and had closed another 20,725 cases during the year.
The IRS says these individuals and groups who are attempting to disrupt
the effective administration of taxes "present a potential threat
to our voluntary compliance system," some by advocating and using
violence against IRS employees. The Government acknowledges that all citizens
have the right to criticize the tax system and Government policies related
to it, as well as to join groups which express such criticisms. But as
IRS Commissioner Roscoe Egger once pointed out: "Once an individual
moves from expressing dissatisfaction to actually employing schemes with
the intention of evading taxes, the Service has an obligation to become
involved in order to protect the Government's revenue base and to preserve
the tax system."
The basic element in any illegal tax protester scheme is a challenge
to the Government's authority to levy and collect taxes. A common characteristic
of tax-protest rhetoric is the misleading appeal to patriotism and righteous
indignation. Because everyone knows the American Revolution started with
a protest against taxes, these appeals to patriotism lead many tax-protest
followers into believing that what they are doing is as "American"
as apple pie and motherhood. However, illegal tax-protest activities are
not really the American way because taxpayers do have legal ways to protest
the Government's tax policies. Legal tax protesters seek to change the
tax laws through legislation, while continuing to pay their taxes in accordance
with existing laws. They legally and peacefully exercise their right to
petition the Government. California's "Proposition 13" movement
is an example of a legal tax protest movement.
Perhaps the most visible legal challengers of our tax code are the
high-powered tax-law lobbyists on Capitol Hill. There are virtually thousands
of lobbyists trying to influence the writing of the tax code in innumerable
and sometimes mysterious ways that could possibly save their clients millions
of tax dollars. (Sometimes, lobbyists even write sections of the Tax Code.)
While no one can deny that there are flaws in our tax system, our
country is founded upon a respect for law where changes are made through
the law, not by subverting the law. The irony is that many tax protesters
have a "quasi-legal" approach; that is, they initially try to
openly subvert the system with an illegal scheme or clearly meritless constitutional
attack, but then use the court system, a constitutional and legal approach,
to try and prove their point. Using the courts to fight the system and
change the laws is an acknowledgment that our system works.
The question then arises, If these tax protesters go so far as to
recognize the power of the courts by using the courts for their appeals,
then why don't they recognize the previous rulings of the courts in denying
the legitimacy of their claims?
Some tax protesters are truly gullible individuals who have been
victimized by fast-talking promoters into believing that we have a system
of rule without a system of law. For example, many taxpayers have never
even heard of the Tax code and are misled by promoters into believing that
the existence of the IRS and our tax system is based either on some arbitrary,
authoritarian government fiat or some type of historical accident. Typical
arguments making the circuits now are that "wages are not income"
because some law in the early 1900s did not tax wages, or that income tax
withholding is not legal because the Victory War Tax of 1943, which introduced
withholding, has been repealed.
Even though the mechanics of how our tax system works may be a mystery
to many, the existence of our system should not be. It's difficult to comprehend
how anyone could think there is no basic legal foundation to our tax system.
A visit to any practitioner's tax law library should be sufficient evidence
to the contrary, that every mechanism in our tax system has roots embedded
in the tax code. Those who believe otherwise are perfect candidates for
buying portions of the Brooklyn Bridge. the fact is that most illegal tax
protesters are just using these schemes as an excuse not to pay, and their
appeals through the courts are nothing more than delaying tactics to forestall
paying what they know they owe.
If there should be any outrageous indignation, it should come from
the hundred million taxpayers who do pay their taxes, and from the 76 million
who overpay their taxes every year. The Government, as a matter of equity,
owes it to the complying millions to ferret out these subversive activists.
Those who are foolish enough to believe that there will be no day of reckoning
down the road have no understanding of the awesome powers of the IRS. After
the courts have summarily disposed of the tax protester cases, the unpaid
taxes will be assessed, and will have to be paid. The Collection Division
of the IRS has no special leniency policy for tax protesters; they will
not hesitate to use the strongest seizure powers of any governmental authority
in the United States. For a good explanation of IRS's seizure powers, read
my book, When You Owe the IRS.
AUDIT-PROOFER'S STRATEGY RULE
Avoid any type of tax scam or sham that challenges
the legality or constitutionality of the tax system. This is not to say
that you shouldn't challenge any particular provision of the tax code or
any specific action of the IRS when you feel you have a legitimate argument.
But, you must avoid any of the spurious arguments associated with the tax-protest
movement and which have already been defeated numerous times.
IRS Actions Against Illegal Tax Protesters
The IRS says, "The service centers are identifying more protest
returns during processing, and examiners are asserting civil penalties...against
tax protesters who file frivolous returns." The IRS asserted a $500
penalty against 2,343 taxpayers last year for filing frivolous tax returns.
The frivolous-return penalty allowed by Code Section 6702 can be
immediately imposed upon any taxpayer who files a purported return that
fails to contain information from which a correct tax liability can be
determined, or contains information that the self-assessment is substantially
incorrect, and the filing of the return is either due to a frivolous position
or a desire to delay or impede the administration of the Federal income
tax laws.
The penalty is intended to attack a great variety of tax-protest
activities, including: * Returns that are not complete enough to be processed.
* Returns that refer to spurious constitutional arguments instead of being
completed. * Returns that clearly present inconsistent information. * Returns
that made deductions for "war taxes" or for the government not
being "on the gold standard." * Returns that deliberately use
incorrect tax tables.
Unlike other penalties, the frivolous return penalty is not based
on any amount of unpaid tax, and can be assessed immediately by the IRS
upon filing of the return, with no requirement of an advance notice. Because
Congress imposed this penalty to halt the increase of protester returns,
the processing of which "delays and impedes the administration of
the internal revenue laws," a taxpayer who submits multiple frivolous
returns will be subject of multiple frivolous penalties.
The Criminal Investigations Division investigates violations of federal
tax laws and related offenses. In 1986, about 15 percent of their general
enforcement program resources were devoted to illegal tax protesters and
fraudulent tax shelters.
The program effort on illegal tax protesters concentrated on the
investigation of leaders and promoters of major protest groups and schemes
with significant numbers of participants. One investigation resulted in
a 19-count indictment of nine leaders of a major mail-order ministry scheme.
They were charged with evading the payment of taxes on about $10 million
of income received from the sale of mail-order ministry charters. Approximately
1,000 taxpayers who bought those charters and took improper tax deductions
for "contributions" to their own churches will have to pay millions
of dollars in back taxes and penalties.
Tax Court Actions Against Illegal Tax Protesters
Even though the Government hasn't released any statistics, it is
clear from the volume of Tax Court opinions being issued, that a large
percentage of docketed cases also pertain to tax-protester appeals. The
Tax Court frequently issues summary opinions on these cases against the
protester-taxpayers in very short statements denouncing their arguments
as "frivolous and without merit." Under Code Section 6673 the
Tax Court is also awarding damages to the government up to $5,000 against
taxpayers pursuing these ridiculous claims. The award is made, "Whenever
it appears to the Tax Court that proceedings before it have been instituted
or maintained by the taxpayer primarily for delay or that the taxpayer's
position in such proceedings is frivolous or groundless."
Next Section: Common Tax Protest Schemes
Audit Proofing Main | Home
© 1986, 1998 to 2002, Jack Warren Wade, Jr.
|