Home >
Audit Proofing Stratagies > Audit-Misconception #2
Audit-Misconception #2
"Each
year I file my tax return around April 15th because it reduces my chances
of being audited."
This misconception, started a few years ago by another tax author,
was based on an erroneous assumption about the IRS's computer system.
During the processing routine all tax returns are scored or rated
for audit potential under IRS's top secret computer program called DIF,
for Discriminant Function. The higher the DIF score, the greater the potential
of bringing in additional taxes under the audit. The IRS strives to audit
the higher-scored returns first BECAUSE of the expectation of getting more
revenue for government coffers. DIF scores are developed from an analysis
of a series (involving up to 50,000 randomly selected returns) of intensive
audits, conducted every few years, called the Taxpayer Compliance Measurement
Program (TCMP). In a TCMP audit, the IRS will analyze every item on the
tax return, including proof of income. (DIF scores therefore reflect correlated
averages found on a cross-section of tax returns.)
The assumption behind this misconception is that a cut-off score
of 240 may be the high cut-off score in February when fewer returns are
filed, but 260 may be the cut-off score in April when more returns are
filed. Therefore, if your DIF score is somewhere between 240 and 260, then
your chances of being audited are lessened by filing in April when everyone
else files.
This misconception is based on a poor understanding of how returns
are selected for audit. The selection process does not even begin until
after the end of June, over two months past the end of the April 15 deadline.
The first step occurs when computer-selected returns are arranged in batches
of examination class, a method used to categorize returns by the amount
of income reported. All returns are placed into one of 12 classes based
on their total positive income (TPI) for individuals or total gross receipts
(TGR) for businesses. (See Exhibit 5-3 in Chapter 5 for a breakdown of
each TPI and TGR category, the number and percentage of returns audited
and the average tax and penalty recommended per return in each category.)
Throughout the year, district IRS offices place orders with the IRS
service centers for returns to audit. The service center then pulls those
returns that are above a specific DIF cutoff score and sends them to the
district office. Districts are required to order returns numerous times
over a twelve-month period so that all tax returns, regardless of their
filing date, have an equal chance of being delivered to the district for
classification,a manual selection procedure performed by revenue agents
called classifiers.
Another aspect of the selection system is the actual classification
process. The IRS requires that the highest DIF scores within each examination
class be pulled and manually screened for audit potential by the classifier.
A high DIF score is "any return with a score above the median score
delivered for each examination class."
If it appears to the classifier that the tax return is in order or
that you have included sufficient substantiating or appropriate documentation
with the return, the return will most likely be sent back to the service
center without being audited. The classifier relies of his or her experience,
judgment, and instincts to analyze the returns to find the ones with the
greatest likelihood of change.
This interesting part of this whole process is that while the classifier
receives a high Dif-Score return, the various items on the return that
resulted in the high DIF score are not identified. Therefore, the classifier
must decide what items on the tax return will be questioned during the
audit. More than any other non-DIF factor, the classifier's decision is
the most significant variable in the selection process. See Exhibit 0-1
for IRS guidelines to classifiers on how to identify significant issues
when selecting returns for audit.
Agents with classification experience have stated that subjective
factors frequently enter into the selection process. For example, one classifier
selected returns that were sloppily prepared, or ones that had a lot of
rounded numbers in the expense columns (for example, $25,000 for travel
expenses instead of $24,679). Another agent stated he selected returns
that were prepared by certain commercial tax preparers.
The fact is you cannot influence your DIF score, and you should not
try by fooling around with the expense figures on your return. But you
may be able to influence the classifier's decision and reduce your chances
of being audited by following this simple rule that may turn out to be
the single most important audit-proofing strategy rule in the entire book:
AUDIT-PROOFER'S STRATEGY RULE
If you want to reduce your chances of being
selected for an audit, you should attach supporting and substantiating
documentation to your return.
While attaching documentation to the tax return is not commonly done,
and frowned on by the IRS, a classifier may not bother with selecting your
tax return for audit if the items under question are supported with photocopies
of canceled checks, or legal documents, or other records. You are not
required to send supporting and substantiating documentation at the time
of filing, but by doing so you can make a constructive contribution to
reduce your chances of being audited.
It is not necessary to include supporting documentation on every
item, just the ones that you think are unusual enough to be questioned.
But if you really want to play it safe, attach a copy of every supporting
document you have- but never send an original document with your tax return;
it could be lost. Don't worry if your tax return is one inch thick- the
IRS is used to fat packages. Use a large brown envelope if you have to.
Generally it is a safe strategy to inundate them with paper.
Next Section: Audit Misconception #3
Audit Proofing Main | Home
© 1986, 1998 to 2002, Jack Warren Wade, Jr.
|